Posted on 09/07/2009 8:25:54 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Bite your tongue! I don’t like what you just said. ;)
ping.
It’s a BAD night to be a troll...
ping
I don’t know all the legal technicalities about DOJ entering as attorneys for the defendants, but once DOJ did entered as representing the defendants, it essentially became their duty (as all defendants’ attorneys do in all cases) to file a motion to dismiss the case. The plaintiffs have the opportunity to oppose the motion. A motion to dismiss is not anything special, really.
Is Barry Dunham-Soetoro giving us the bird in that pic ???
Nonsense. IF proven ineligible, we’ll drag his sorry ass out.
Wonder how many laws Holder has broken?
LOL.
Are they there under an amicus motion? If so how can they move for dismissal?
Obviously we are over the target. The frothing fools try to pull out he stops.And the argument is specioius if the facts in issue were neither before the People during the election, nor before the College of Electors and the Leagislators after the election.
Prediction: DOJ loses.
Right now we are punished with Stanley Ann’s baby..
Every American citizen is harmed by a fraudulent election—we all have standing on that point alone!
I have to give the credit to FReeper rolling_stone, who posted the same thing two weeks ago on another thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2322673/posts?page=26#26
I would think the flag officers would want to know this for sure because they would have some liability for following his orders and making the rest of the armed forces follow them. The whole “I was just following orders” excuse does not save officers.
Of course, that will be fought in court for the next 3 years without resolution...but it will hang over his administration and allow any future candidate to insist he publish his long-form certificate.
If it is ever found that he knowingly usurped the office of the President of the United States, he should be tried and hung for treason.
Your logic is reversed.
The power to govern comes from the people , and their consent to be governed cannot be obtained through fraudulent means.
Its amazing the DOJ even knows anything about this suit. Good point. By comparison, this case is a blip on the DOJ radar, and yet it gets the notice of the DOJ to drop the case??! One other point is that the DOJ says: “challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for president can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress...” It's almost as if the DOJ has never heard of the phrase "NEW EVIDENCE". LOL One other observation of Friday's DOJ filing is they say, “Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch.” Although the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” is not a direct part of Orly's complaint, Congress has shown itself INCAPABLE of defining “Natural Born Citizen” in nearly 30 attempts since the 1870s. Although the Judicial Branch doesn't get involved in political issues, it can “order” Congress to define “Natural Born Citizen” as a means to dodge this issue and end the age-old academic (and legal) question of exactly who is a “Natural Born Citizen” as defined by the Founders (Freepers know THAT answer). |
Isn’t there a conflict of interest involved here, anyways?
Btw, I think you’re right, it’ll be tossed.
Idiot, what if evidence comes to light after the electors have done their job? And the Legislative branch refuses to do its job? What is this a 2 month statute of limitations on electors? And a free pass if the Legislature is corrupt? What happened to checks and balances, did Obamanation write checks to the Judicial branch too? I hope Orly can argue against this crapola.
Beauty, Nana
Home movies? Haven't heard that one before.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.