Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panic in D.C. ? Justice urges birth suit tossed
WorldNetDaily ^ | SEPTEMBER 07, 2009 | WorldNetDaily

Posted on 09/07/2009 8:25:54 PM PDT by RobinMasters

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last
To: xkaydet65

Bite your tongue! I don’t like what you just said. ;)


41 posted on 09/07/2009 8:58:42 PM PDT by Beloved Levinite (I have a new name for the occupier of The Oval Office: KING FRAUD! (pronounced King "Faa-raud"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; ...

ping.

It’s a BAD night to be a troll...


42 posted on 09/07/2009 9:00:19 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 229 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Can you call this a Manchurian candidate with an agenda?
43 posted on 09/07/2009 9:00:26 PM PDT by doubtful (obama is the American chavez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; Fudd Fan; MarkLevinFan

ping


44 posted on 09/07/2009 9:00:38 PM PDT by Beloved Levinite (I have a new name for the occupier of The Oval Office: KING FRAUD! (pronounced King "Faa-raud"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spyone

I don’t know all the legal technicalities about DOJ entering as attorneys for the defendants, but once DOJ did entered as representing the defendants, it essentially became their duty (as all defendants’ attorneys do in all cases) to file a motion to dismiss the case. The plaintiffs have the opportunity to oppose the motion. A motion to dismiss is not anything special, really.


45 posted on 09/07/2009 9:00:47 PM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doubtful

Is Barry Dunham-Soetoro giving us the bird in that pic ???


46 posted on 09/07/2009 9:01:37 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

Nonsense. IF proven ineligible, we’ll drag his sorry ass out.


47 posted on 09/07/2009 9:02:23 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I have noticed. It is an agency totally out of control. When you have long-time employees telling Holder and company not to dismiss charges against the new Black Panthers in Philly, and they do anyway, it speaks volumes that Holder will do what he wants. Holder doesn’t care about the Rule of Law at all.

Wonder how many laws Holder has broken?

Photobucket

48 posted on 09/07/2009 9:03:01 PM PDT by IYellAtMyTV (Workday Forecast--Increasing pressure towards afternoon. Rum likely by evening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
DOJ has no standing in this case.

LOL.

Are they there under an amicus motion? If so how can they move for dismissal?

Obviously we are over the target. The frothing fools try to pull out he stops.And the argument is specioius if the facts in issue were neither before the People during the election, nor before the College of Electors and the Leagislators after the election.

Prediction: DOJ loses.

49 posted on 09/07/2009 9:03:16 PM PDT by Candor7 (The weapons of choice against fascism are ridicule ,derision ,truth. (member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

Right now we are punished with Stanley Ann’s baby..


50 posted on 09/07/2009 9:04:05 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

Every American citizen is harmed by a fraudulent election—we all have standing on that point alone!


51 posted on 09/07/2009 9:05:12 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Beloved Levinite; rolling_stone

I have to give the credit to FReeper rolling_stone, who posted the same thing two weeks ago on another thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2322673/posts?page=26#26


52 posted on 09/07/2009 9:05:17 PM PDT by Deo volente (Obamacare: In critical condition, on life support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

I would think the flag officers would want to know this for sure because they would have some liability for following his orders and making the rest of the armed forces follow them. The whole “I was just following orders” excuse does not save officers.


53 posted on 09/07/2009 9:05:57 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
All they need is a plausible enough BS story for a Judge to order discovery.

Of course, that will be fought in court for the next 3 years without resolution...but it will hang over his administration and allow any future candidate to insist he publish his long-form certificate.

If it is ever found that he knowingly usurped the office of the President of the United States, he should be tried and hung for treason.

54 posted on 09/07/2009 9:08:46 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Bull Shite. This wrong happened through the refusal or failure of certain legislators to due their sworn duty. Therefore it is up to the citizenry to bring this case.

Your logic is reversed.

The power to govern comes from the people , and their consent to be governed cannot be obtained through fraudulent means.

55 posted on 09/07/2009 9:09:17 PM PDT by Candor7 (The weapons of choice against fascism are ridicule ,derision ,truth. (member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Balata; All

It’s amazing the DOJ even knows anything about this suit.

Good point. By comparison, this case is a blip on the DOJ radar, and yet it gets the notice of the DOJ to drop the case??!

One other point is that the DOJ says: “challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for president can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress...”

It's almost as if the DOJ has never heard of the phrase "NEW EVIDENCE". LOL

One other observation of Friday's DOJ filing is they say, “Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch.”

Although the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” is not a direct part of Orly's complaint, Congress has shown itself INCAPABLE of defining “Natural Born Citizen” in nearly 30 attempts since the 1870s. Although the Judicial Branch doesn't get involved in political issues, it can “order” Congress to define “Natural Born Citizen” as a means to dodge this issue and end the age-old academic (and legal) question of exactly who is a “Natural Born Citizen” as defined by the Founders (Freepers know THAT answer).


56 posted on 09/07/2009 9:09:45 PM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Isn’t there a conflict of interest involved here, anyways?

Btw, I think you’re right, it’ll be tossed.


57 posted on 09/07/2009 9:10:21 PM PDT by Baladas ((ABBHO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
"Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch."

Idiot, what if evidence comes to light after the electors have done their job? And the Legislative branch refuses to do its job? What is this a 2 month statute of limitations on electors? And a free pass if the Legislature is corrupt? What happened to checks and balances, did Obamanation write checks to the Judicial branch too? I hope Orly can argue against this crapola.

58 posted on 09/07/2009 9:10:38 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Beauty, Nana


59 posted on 09/07/2009 9:11:38 PM PDT by Beloved Levinite (I have a new name for the occupier of The Oval Office: KING FRAUD! (pronounced King "Faa-raud"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SandWMan
Even with a dozen Kenyan eyewitnesses, a verifiable Kenyan birth certificate, and home movies...

Home movies? Haven't heard that one before.

60 posted on 09/07/2009 9:11:57 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson