[redk]

"The WSJ piece is yet another Palin lie.

This new version of Sarah Palin is like those lip-synch groups from the '90s that didn't sing their own songs or write their own lyrics. She's the Milli Vanilli of American politics."

Wow this WSJ op-ed has these people really freaked out.

[Dem Guard]

This new version of Sarah Palin is like those lip-synch groups from the ‘90s that didn’t sing their own songs or write their own lyrics. She’s the Milli Vanilli of American politics.

You mean like Obama?????

[Carl LaFong]

Looks like we have us another Palin OCD sufferer.I’ve heard they have very effective medications for that now.

[thecabal]

Murdoch has anted up a seven-figure advance for a book written by someone who can't construct two cohesive sentences together.

Now this is a smear campaign. They are just blatantly making shit up.

[Crim]

They HATE her....I mean HAAAAAAAATE...

She’s right on target...

[St. Louis Conservative]

Are these people under the impression that Obama writes his own speeches, articles, and books??

[KarlInOhio]

This new version of Sarah Palin is like those lip-synch groups from the '90s that didn't sing their own songs or write their own lyrics. She's the Milli Vanilli of American politics."

Spoken by supporters of William Ayers's and George Soros's hand puppet.

[rightwingcrazy]

Why does the Left keep going on and on about a former VP candidate? About what she writes on Twitter? They-Are-Obsessed.

[conservativeharleyguy]

Hmmm... a puppet whose strings are pulled by Rupert Murdoch vs a puppet whose strings are pulled by George Soros. If that’s the case, and given a choice, I’ll take the former please. At least she’s pleasant to look at.

[Little Pig]

“Murdoch has anted up a seven-figure advance for a book written by someone who can’t construct two cohesive sentences together.”

Murdoch is publishing Obama’s next book?

[jagusafr]

“a book written by someone who can’t construct two cohesive sentences together.”

Either redundant or ignorant: if “cohesive”, “construct” already makes the point. If “coherent”, the writer shows why a thesaurus is such a great tool.

Sheesh...

Colonel, USAFR

[bcsco]

Wow this WSJ op-ed has these people really freaked out.

Well, the timing is well nigh perfect, and it's in one of the nations major dailies. Add that to the idea (ones they know all too well) that she's immensely popular in middle-America, her brilliant definition of "Death Panels" helped solidify Tea Party opposition to the congressional healthcare bills, and she's shown her disdain for their constant barrage of baseless slander, they have someone who's quickly becoming a new "Teflon" personality. Oh, the horror of it all.

[WVKayaker]

If we wish to fight, the enemy can be forced to an engagement even though he be sheltered behind a high rampart and a deep ditch. All we need do is attack some other place that he will be obliged to relieve. If we do not wish to fight, we can prevent the enemy from engaging us even though the lines of our encampment be merely traced out on the ground. All we need do is to throw something odd and unaccountable in his way.
- Sun Tzu

[marstegreg]

Sounds like she’s getting under their skin. The claws are definately out.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Sorry JeLo, the op-ed is going viral today and there isn’t a dam& thing you Obots can do about it.

[Jeff Head]

"written by someone who can't construct two cohesive sentences together"

Oh...you must be talking about Obama whenever he's off the TOTUS.

...and what's this about, constructing two cohesive sentences together, anyway?

Really, I mean they are making this too easy.

So, how about this from her Facebook page today:

"President Obama argues that Democrats' "will provide every American with some basic consumer protections that will finally hold insurance companies accountable." Of course consumer protection sounds like a good idea. And it's true that insurance companies can be unaccountable and unresponsive institutions—much like the federal government. That similarity makes this shift in focus seem like nothing more than an attempt to deflect attention away from the details of the Democrats' proposals—proposals that will increase our deficit, decrease our paychecks, and increase the power of unaccountable government technocrats.

"Instead, let's talk about real health-care reform: market-oriented, patient-centered, and result-driven. As the Cato Institute's Michael Cannon and others have argued, such policies include giving all individuals the same tax benefits received by those who get coverage through their employers; providing Medicare recipients with vouchers that allow them to purchase their own coverage; reforming tort laws to potentially save billions each year in wasteful spending; and changing costly state regulations to allow people to buy insurance across state lines. Rather than another top-down government plan, let's give Americans control over their own health care.

"We often hear such overblown promises from Washington. With the facts in hand, tell them that this time we're not buying it." Sarah Palin - September 8, 2009

It's obvious that Sarah still has the left, the DNC, the MSM and the RINOs all in a frenzy wondering what her next move will be and how it will be perceived...they almost literally froth at the mouth in their efforts to discredit her.

While they do this, and further discredit only themselves in the effort, Sarah is going to write her book, give speeches and promote conservatie principles all over this country in the midst of the Obama administration disaster and gain great political capital in the process.

Then she will support conservative candidates in 2010 and help them win, amassing much more political capital. She will then take all of that capital and make an awesome, stunning, and successful run for the Presidency in 2012.

MANY MORE STICKER DESIGNS HERE

"...like that grizzly guards her cubs, as a mother naturally guards her own. I will keep that vow wherever the road may lead." - Sarah Palin, July 26, 2009

SARAH PALIN STANDING IN THE BREACH

A steadfast, growing, purposeful, committed opposition to the destruction Obama and those who support him are causing has formed. Against him and the assinine foolishness associated with trying to transform this nation into a marxist construct, something that has proven to be so abjectly disasterous and failing everytime it has been tried in history. The Health Care issue has turned over this ant hill, and now it is being reflected in all of the polls.

Obama, the DNC, the far left and the MSM all fear this rising opposition and are finding they are incapable of controlling it or its spread. That is why they are desperately trying to demonize and categorizing traditional Americans. But the slumbering giant has stirred, and he is waking up hopping mad.

EZEKIEL EMANUEL AND OBAMA HEALTH CARE
(Must Read - Shocking, cited quotes by Emanuel)

OBAMA HEALTH CARE BY THE NUMBERS

AMERICA AT THE CROSSROADS OF HISTORY

A PETITION ON FACEBOOK FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RESTORATION

OBAMA IS A MARXIST IDEOLOGUE

[ThunderSleeps]

Forget H1N1, it would appear PDS is the real epidemic. Why do they hate her so much? Maybe because she is everything they are not? Attractive, intelligent, successful, moral, happy, reasonable, rational, and right.

[Carley]

Actually Van Jones and Barak Obama are the Milli Vanilli of this generation.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

by someone who can't construct two cohesive sentences together

Painfully amateurish construction, there, for anyone mistakenly feeling up to the task of criticizing others on the esthetics and efficacy of their own efforts at composition.

Just sayin', is all. ;)

[Constitutionalist Conservative]

This new version of Sarah Palin is like those lip-synch groups from the '90s that didn't sing their own songs or write their own lyrics. She's the Milli Vanilli of American politics.

I didn't know that 1989 was part of the '90s.

[paudio]

They really have forgotten that Palin was once a journalist. While she didn't go to law school or 'prestigious' journalism school, saying that she cannot write a coherent sentence is saying much about the author of this piece, not about Palin.