[SampleMan]

Really. None of those are stone block arches that look like the Arch de Triumph. You might as well show me pictures of trees and claim that houses occur naturally.

[ElectricStrawberry]

So what you've done is pigeon-hole YOUR argument away form the original argument byh introducing man-made arches.

The original:

An arch is a beautiful thing, mechanically strong and efficient, and removing any one part of it causes it to collapse. If I were so inclined I would say it was designed upon seeing one, yet we see such arches created by natural processes. My conclusion is that complexity is often in the eye of the beholder.

HINT: "If I were so inclined I would say it was designed upon seeing one, yet we see such arches created by natural processes."

Running off on a keystone man-made argument is just...well....I'm sure GourmetDan will fill you in on which logical fallacy that is.

[Pistolshot]

God is all powerful, why would he labor when he could wave his hands and create an arch?