Posted on 09/10/2009 7:46:26 PM PDT by machogirl
As soon as I started covering Barack Obama, I knew he was going to be trouble.
Not Global Trouble, like W. and Dick Cheney. Or Hanky-Panky Trouble, like Bill Clinton and John Edwards. Or Tedious Trouble, like John Kerry and Michael Dukakis.
He was going to be the kind of guy who whipped you up and then, when you were all excited, left you flat, and then, when you were deflated and exasperated and time was running out, ensorcelled you again with some sparkly fairy dust.
It’s an irritating pattern. Not as puerile as Bill Clinton’s pattern of wasting time and plunging into personal chaos, or as horrifying as Dick Cheney’s routine of bullying and cutting paper dolls out of the Constitution.
But not as reliably uplifting as Jed Bartlet either.
After keeping his great powers of persuasion and elucidation under wraps all summer, the president at long last comes forward to explain his health care plan to an utterly confused and increasingly skeptical and wary public.
He should have done this speech back in June and conjured up a better glossary. You can’t combat a scintillating term like “death panels” with a somnambulant one like “public option.”
President Obama is so wrapped up in his desire to be a different, more conciliatory, beer-summit kind of leader, he ignores some verities.
Sometimes, when you’ve got the mojo, you have to keep your foot on your opponent’s neck. When you’re trying to get a Sisyphean agenda passed, it’s good if people in the way — including rebellious elements in your own party — fear you.
Civil discourse is fine, but when the other side is fighting dirty, you should get angry. Don’t let the bully kick sand in your face. The White House should have impaled death panel malarkey as soon as it came up.
By the time the president got feisty in a speech on Monday, the inmates had taken over cable TV, much like the spooky spirits swarming up over Bald Mountain in “Fantasia.”
Even Steve Hildebrand, the strategist who helped shape Obama’s historic win in the Iowa caucuses, complains that his former hero “needs to be more bold in his leadership.” Disenchanted at Obama’s disengaged approach on health care and gay rights, Hildebrand told Politico’s Ben Smith that he was “losing patience.”
It was one thing for Obama to delegate freely when he was on the Harvard Law Review, but it’s madness to go play golf and delegate freely to Congress, letting Nancy Pelosi make your case. After signaling that there was nothing he’d fall on his sword for on health care; after dropping Van Jones at the first objection from Glenn Beck — a demagoon who called Obama a “racist” — the president is getting to be seen as an easy mark.
If Obama didn’t have a knife-thrower like Rahmbo in the Oval, Democrats would be totally convinced that the president would fold in a heartbeat.
In the absence of more vivid presidential leadership, the Democrats have reverted to their old DNA — self-destructive scrapping and spending. And the Republicans are sticking to theirs — being mean-spirited and shameless, attacking big government spending while taking no blame for their own.
Just as he let Hillary breathe new life into her faltering campaign in New Hampshire, Obama let the moribund Republicans revivify themselves in the slashing image of Limbaugh and Palin. Administration officials have been chortling that Republicans overreached in criticizing the president for giving a speech urging kids to study hard, write their own destiny and wash their hands.
It’s true that Republicans who objected looked risible. On MSNBC, Joe Watkins, a G.O.P. strategist, explained the perils of letting “one of the most gifted speakers that the world has ever seen” speak to impressionable children.
What if next time, he asked, the president made a strong argument to kids about the Defense of Marriage Act? “What if,” he wondered, “kids come back home and say to their mom and dad, when the president who they like and who they agree with, tells them marriage is not necessarily between a man and a woman?”
But if such Republicans seem loco, and the far left looks easily outmaneuvered, the president seems lame, too, for letting the crazies and uglies get on offense all summer, showcased by a superficial media beast. Laura Bush had to ride to Obama’s rescue and explain that he wasn’t a brain-washing alien, that it was a good thing for a president to inspire kids.
It shouldn’t take a superhuman effort by the Democrats, with an assist from a Republican former first lady, to beat back the most obviously nutty, stupid things that Republicans say.
The president told students on Tuesday that “being successful is hard” and “you won’t necessarily succeed at everything the first time you try.”
He should take his own words to heart. He can live long and prosper by being less Spocky and more Rocky.
There's a word you don't see every day.
no and “fairy dust” all in the same sentence and describing Obama.
Jed Bartlet?
Isn’t that the TV Prez. from the West Wing?
Yada, yada, yada. It puts me to sleep. Dowd has the intelligence of a two-year-old. In fact my two-year-old grandson is a lot more interesting to listen to.
Someone should tell Maureen that folks go right to sleep when you throw exotic words like that at them, and usually don't understand a single word thereafter.
I'm sure the balance of the article is good, but I quit reading right there. Gotta find a dictionary before I can go on.
is that the “proactive” anecdote to a pic of maureen dowd?
Hoochie Mama! That’s a new one!
Look, I scanned the article all the way to the bottom, like a boy eating his spinach to get at dessert, for one reason only
where are the pictures ?
Especially when you are the recipient of every affirmative action program there is...
More like it
fancy word for “bewitch”
Maureen is all hot and bothered again. Boring.
#5, you scanned too fast.
Dems the rulez!
a picture of maureen dowd? surely you jest?
Like this guy, Maureen?
Got it, but no, it was being posted while I was typing, could have been more patient though, but, having gagged down that spinach, dessert was expected.
Hmmm. Sisyphus was condemned to roll a boulder up a hill only to watch it roll down again for all eternity.
I would love to see that happen to BO and his agenda.
in reading her article, without knowing she is a she, i’d swear i was reading something written by a hormone driven guy complaining that after all the teasing, the girl said NO!
or
it was chris matthews trying to describe his “tingle”
Even smilin Bob would refuse to hit MD.
lol, i thought that was only for “Helen Thomas” threads.
After going a couple of rounds with Sarah Palin, Odumbo is crying “ You gotta cut me, Mick !”
that is funny
i’ve never seen libs so scared of a “girl” ;)
“He was going to be the kind of guy who whipped you up and then, when you were all excited, left you flat, and then, when you were deflated and exasperated and time was running out, ensorcelled you again with some sparkly fairy dust.”
Obviously Maureen needs to leave her elitist circles with metro-sexuals and find a real American man.
Please do keep giving advice to the TOTUS-reading fuhrer, dowdy.
With people like you helping him, we’ll take 2012 without even breaking a sweat.
You gotta love the left. Dumber than a bag of hammers. They still don’t understand the convergence of improbable events that got the fuhrer into office.
Mrs. Michael Douglas is one of the most beautiful women on the planet.
Haha, I was thinking the same thing when I read that. Maureen’s all upset because Obama didn’t take her there.
This woman is delusional.
“He was going to be the kind of guy who whipped you up and then, when you were all excited, left you flat”
That didn’t happen with Larry Sinclair Maureen, only with you.
It’s amazing how utterly disconnected from reality this shrew is.
I would be embarrassed to have authored a piece like that.
I can’t even imagine a conservative writer, spouting that dribble about Bush 1 and 2, and Ronald Reagan.
LOL! That is so funny the way you put it. Great line.
oops and ouch
In other words the speech was dead in the water!! Bawhaha
Rules is rules...
and this being her “reality”.
does every lib woman and some lib men have fantasies about Obama?
I'm guessing she's bedded down with at least two of these creatures...(excluding Dukakis.)
Hey mojo! Maureen Dowd is telling your secrets.
Dowd and Streisand - Dumb and Dumber. Not sure which one really is dumber. It is a close race.
Kerry?
Hey even Bill might have some standards.
This is the only reason I click on Dowd threads!
very close.
Bill. I rememeber that she changed her tiny byline photo to this ‘heavy on the lipstick’ photo while Clinton was in office.
‘remember’. Yeah.
He proved he had none when he married this...
I thought I was the only one...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.