1 posted on
09/17/2009 8:29:26 AM PDT by
cc2k
To: goldstategop; nutmeg; CDFingers; SunTzuWu; a fool in paradise; Prokopton; KarlInOhio; ...
2 posted on
09/17/2009 8:30:57 AM PDT by
cc2k
(Are you better off today than you were $4,000,000,000,000 ago?)
To: cc2k
Well, heres the reality. We the voters determine who represents us in Washington, DC. We also decide who represents us in our state capitols, our county seats and even our city halls. We also elect (directly or indirectly) leaders of the executive branch in Washington DC, and in all the lower levels of government. Term limits are possible with no changes to the current rules! All that needs to change is the behavior of the electorate.A lack of term limits is why we have people like McCain, Byrd, Kennedy, Murtha, Schumer in office so long.
5 posted on
09/17/2009 8:36:04 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(The best aid we could ever give Africa would be thousands of rifles to throw out their own dictators)
To: cc2k
6 posted on
09/17/2009 8:37:17 AM PDT by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: cc2k
No person shall serve more than 12 years in total as a US Senator. No person shall serve more than 12 years in total as a US Representative. No person shall serve more than 12 years total for the offices of President or Vice President. No person shall serve more than 12 years in total in any position that answers directly to the President, Vice President, Senator or Representative
To: cc2k
They should serve only two terms, one in Congress and one in jail.
10 posted on
09/17/2009 8:57:34 AM PDT by
stockpirate
(Joe Wilson Truth Czar for a Free Republic!)
To: cc2k
Sorry, but I’d still rather see term limits embedded in the Constitution by means of a formal amendment.
To: cc2k
16 posted on
09/17/2009 9:53:47 AM PDT by
xeno
To: cc2k
Unfortunately, excess incumbency is NOT JUST a voter problem. It is caused by LOCAL redistricting that strongly favors incumbency, and rewards longevity with increasingly friendly wards and precincts.
The only cure for that is to outlaw “Gerrymandering” - the creation of highly distorted, meandering districts that accumulate tiny pockets of support within a sea of opposition. The only mechanism I thought of would be to set a legal maximum ratio of district boundary to district area. Mathematically, the minimum would be 2xPi - about 6.284 - for an almost perfectly circular district. I don’t know what the maximum should be, but my own district is probably in triple digits.
25 posted on
10/07/2009 9:52:51 AM PDT by
MainFrame65
(The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson