Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Capt. Connie Rhodes says she never OK'd appeal (CONFIRMED)
Columbus (GA) Ledger-Enquirer ^ | 9/19/09 | ALAN RIQUELMY

Posted on 09/19/2009 11:29:41 AM PDT by jamese777

Army Capt. Connie Rhodes, who filed a complaint Sept. 4 in U.S. District Court that sought to stop her deployment to Iraq by arguing that President Barack Obama can’t legitimately hold office, says in a Friday letter that she never authorized her attorney to appeal a Wednesday ruling against her.

Additionally, Judge Clay Land – who denied Rhodes’ request and threatened sanctions against her lawyer, Orly Taitz, a national figure in the “birther” movement – states that Taitz has two weeks from Friday to explain why he shouldn’t impose a $10,000 penalty against the California lawyer.

Both Land’s order and Rhodes’ letter came on the heels of a Thursday request from the captain that Land reconsider his Wednesday order against her. In that order, Land called Rhodes’ Sept. 4 complaint “frivolous,” and says Taitz could face sanctions if she ever again filed in his court a similar frivolous action. In her Friday letter, Rhodes states that she never told Taitz to file for a reconsideration, and that she intends to formally complain about her attorney.

“I became aware on last night’s local news cast that a motion to stay my deployment had been entered on my behalf,” Rhodes’ Friday to Land states. “I did not authorize this motion to be filed.

“Furthermore, I do not wish for Ms. Taitz to file any future motions or represent me in any way in this court. It is my plan to file a complaint with the California State Bar due to her reprehensible and unprofessional actions,” Rhodes states.

Rhodes says she is currently deploying to Iraq, and that it’s evident her initial complaint was “full of political conjecture, which was not my interest. I had no intention of refusing orders nor will I. I simply wanted to verify the lawfulness of my orders.”

(Excerpt) Read more at ledger-enquirer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; connierhodes; orlytaitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: deport

How do you know they haven’t???


61 posted on 09/19/2009 11:06:58 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Why should he do that???

OU are the one one who put CONFIRMED in()!!!

62 posted on 09/19/2009 11:22:43 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mlo

Who says so???


63 posted on 09/19/2009 11:24:52 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mlo

Where have we or anyone else seen the B.C.???


64 posted on 09/19/2009 11:26:29 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: danamco

How do you know they haven’t???


I don’t but it isn’t like Orly the mouth to keep things hush hush. In other words she has to blab it as much as she can on her blog or other outlets. Have you seen any denials from either?


65 posted on 09/20/2009 6:10:19 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Well?

Don’t keep us hanging.

Where’s the confirmation?


66 posted on 09/20/2009 7:11:07 AM PDT by MrLuigi (incompetence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

If you’re still waiting to hear directly, why did you lie when you posted the headline?


67 posted on 09/20/2009 12:29:21 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: danamco
Photobucket
68 posted on 09/20/2009 12:32:24 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

If you’re still waiting to hear directly, why did you lie when you posted the headline?


“Confirmed” by the reporter for the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer and “confirmed” by Judge Land or by Captain Rhodes herself are two different levels of confirmation.
I’ll wait for original source confirmation after reading the secondary source confirmation.
Patience, grasshopper!


69 posted on 09/20/2009 1:01:02 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

The reporter didn’t confirm anything, he only rehashed. You altered the title by claiming a confirmation which never happened. Can’t you advance your anti-American agenda with something other than lies?


70 posted on 09/20/2009 1:09:05 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: mlo

You should answer the man’s question. Where, exactly, have you seen a birth certificate for Barry? Use words, be specific. Posting a purported photo of a Certification of Live Birth is unresponsive and indicative of a hardcore anti-American agenda on your part.


71 posted on 09/20/2009 1:12:22 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

The reporter didn’t confirm anything, he only rehashed. You altered the title by claiming a confirmation which never happened. Can’t you advance your anti-American agenda with something other than lies?


Yawn.


72 posted on 09/20/2009 1:20:24 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

I don’t know how you get posting a photo of the document is unresponsive. That’s just weird.


73 posted on 09/20/2009 2:00:04 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mlo

He asked when anyone had seen a particular document. You posted a photo of what is purportedly an entirely different document. When exactly did you see Barry’s birth certificate? Be specific.

Your non-responses to date are an admission on your part of your lies earlier in the thread. You should really stop lying. If the truth doesn’t support your bizarre anti-American agenda, you should just shut up rather than lying. It’s not very becoming.


74 posted on 09/20/2009 2:08:56 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

If you are so bored by your lies, why do you keep repeating them?


75 posted on 09/20/2009 2:09:24 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
"You posted a photo of what is purportedly an entirely different document"

No, I posted a copy of the birth certificate.

Watch the personal attacks. If you can't make your case with the facts then you need to reconsider your case. Anyone who says that document is not a birth certificate is lying.

76 posted on 09/20/2009 2:27:49 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: mlo
This Obama birth certificate carries more weight in federal court than your no "factcheck".org, Obama COLB that you posted.


77 posted on 09/20/2009 2:32:19 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Anyone who says that document is not a birth certificate is lying.

That thing is very likely a forgery. We're waiting for Obama to show that thing in court.

78 posted on 09/20/2009 2:35:12 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
This Obama birth certificate carries more weight in federal court than your no "factcheck".org, Obama COLB that you posted.

Oh, really. Maybe you'd like to re-read Judge Land's 14 page smackdown again? Shall I post a link?

79 posted on 09/20/2009 2:48:09 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Yeah really. The Obama Kenyan BC has been submitted to the federal district court in California as evidence, and not in the dismissive Clay Land court in Georgia. Where is that Obama COLB? Nowhere near a court of law.

Obama's COLB is not of real substance ; nothing but zeros and ones that flow across the Internet.

And the so called "smackdown" by Land will be met with a response in the coming days.

80 posted on 09/20/2009 2:56:59 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson