Posted on 09/19/2009 3:24:34 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Frank Rich, you are as pathetic as is humanly possible.
Frank Rich needs his meds adjusted.
What?
Palin was talking skin color?
Talk about the big lie!
Who is Frank Rich?
And why does anyone care?
I’d love to see how many articles have been written about us “racists” over the past week alone. There must be thousands.
>Wilsons televised shout was tantamount to yelling Fire! in a crowded theater.
No it wasn’t... heck, it wasn’t even tantamount to yelling “LIAR!!” in a crowded theater.
It’s fun to grill them on this. To watch their reactions when you ask if they believe that people back in February just didn’t notice that he was black back then. Does the left really think conservatives are just now discovering, “Hey, wait a minute, this guy looks different than the people I know and agree with.” The whole polling numbers for approval back in February make it absurd to think that everyone who disagrees is a racist.
From the desk of cc2k: |
The libs are obsessed with Beck... Just like they were obsessed with Hannity, and Limbaugh, and Palin, and...
He writes that “it gives permission to crazy people”. Rich is the”crazy people”. He should be glad that we have a 1st amendment so that he can write this drivel.
Yep, twelve hours per, every day. : - D
The latest echochamber talking point - and I thought the evil conservatives were the ones with the echochamber.
Flow chart to help leftists spot racists:
http://www.missourah.com/2009/09/15/obama-criticism-flow-chart/
And Frank Rich may not know that Hitler, Stalin, Castro and Pol Pot were --- each and every one of them -- socialists.
Oddly, the execrable Frank Rich arrives at the same conclusion as David Brooks: It's Not About Race. And, like Brooks, he ascribes the Tea Party Movement to a "populist" motive -- even likening its leaders -- whoever they are -- to Father Caughlin (as did David Brooks).
The New York Times has evidently made an institutional decision to drop the race card...and play the "populist demagogue" card.
Now, who gets to be Father Caughlin? Is it Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck.
“Speaking truth to power” is supposed to be a cleansing, cathartic gesture, the clearing of the miasma formed when thinking is clouded or has become noxious.
Face it, Obama talks one way, and acts another, which sends a broad spectrum of mixed signals. He generates his own “white noise” while sending the very meaning of the words he utters down into some “black hole”.
The Emperor STILL has no clothes. No matter how pretty the words, it is all still lipstick on an extremely ugly visage, and becomes a parody of itself even as he speaks.
From their daily drumbeat of demonization of Sarah to the latest "conservatives are racist" rants by virtually all of the msm, they are throwing everything overboard in hopes of keeping the circling sharks away from the sinking Potemkin, "commander zero" still heroically at the helm, his steely eyes locked on the distant horizon of Hope and Change.
Who is Frank Rich?
The only difference with Glenn he does his homework. That what makes him dangerous. It would be nice if Rush did.
He thinks people are crazy now? Just wait until the next revolution for independence begins....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.