Skip to comments.
Asteroid attack: Putting Earth's defences to the test (Air Force runs "72hrs Warning" scenario)
New Scientist ^
| 23 September 2009
| David Shiga
Posted on 09/24/2009 8:05:16 AM PDT by presidio9
IT LOOKS inconsequential enough, the faint little spot moving leisurely across the sky. The mountain-top telescope that just detected it is taking it very seriously, though. It is an asteroid, one never seen before. Rapid-survey telescopes discover thousands of asteroids every year, but there's something very particular about this one. The telescope's software decides to wake several human astronomers with a text message they hoped they would never receive. The asteroid is on a collision course with Earth. It is the size of a skyscraper and it's big enough to raze a city to the ground. Oh, and it will be here in three days.
Far-fetched it might seem, but this scenario is all too plausible. Certainly it is realistic enough that the US air force recently brought together scientists, military officers and emergency-response officials for the first time to assess the nation's ability to cope, should it come to pass.
They were asked to imagine how their respective organisations would respond to a mythical asteroid called Innoculatus striking the Earth after just three days' warning. The asteroid consisted of two parts: a pile of rubble 270 metres across which was destined to splash down in the Atlantic Ocean off the west coast of Africa, and a 50-metre-wide rock heading, in true Hollywood style, directly for Washington DC.
The exercise, which took place in December 2008, exposed the chilling dangers asteroids pose. Not only is there no plan for what to do when an asteroid hits, but our early-warning systems - which could make the difference between life and death - are woefully inadequate. The meeting provided just the wake-up call organiser Peter Garreston had hoped to create. He has long been concerned about the threat of an impact. "As a taxpayer,
(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: asteroids
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
09/24/2009 8:05:16 AM PDT
by
presidio9
To: presidio9
“Lucifers Hammer”
by Larry Niven
2
posted on
09/24/2009 8:06:41 AM PDT
by
dynachrome
(I am Jim Thompson!)
To: dynachrome
3
posted on
09/24/2009 8:09:18 AM PDT
by
DCBryan1
( Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims. Execute child molesters RFN!)
To: presidio9; jenbean
4
posted on
09/24/2009 8:09:33 AM PDT
by
DCBryan1
( Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims. Execute child molesters RFN!)
To: dynachrome
Except that Hamner-Brown was a comet, not an asteroid. Comets are usually much bigger, and more likely to throw debris into the atmosphere. A land-striking nickel-iron asteroid, up to 100-200 meters, would make a heckuva hole, but nothing like a comet strike. Hitting the ocean, on the other hand, would probably be the same for a comet or asteroid. Now, a bigger asteroid, like 500 meters or more, and it’s game over.
5
posted on
09/24/2009 8:10:10 AM PDT
by
Little Pig
(Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
To: DCBryan1
6
posted on
09/24/2009 8:11:01 AM PDT
by
presidio9
("Don't shoot. Let 'em burn.")
To: presidio9
Actually the procedure for what to do if you detect a massive asteroid on collision course with the Earth with only 72 hours warning is well established.
(1) Place head firmly between legs.
(2) Kiss your @ss goodbye.
No a year or two worth of warning we might have a chance. Given a decade we could definitely do something. But 72 hours, bah. You couldn't even fuel and launch a shuttle in 72 hours.
7
posted on
09/24/2009 8:11:13 AM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world, and they are all out to get me.)
To: presidio9
Women and minorities hurt worse!!!
Also Bush's fault.
8
posted on
09/24/2009 8:14:47 AM PDT
by
Springman
(Rest In Peace YaYa123)
To: presidio9
To: Little Pig
“asteroid consisted of two parts: a pile of rubble 270 metres across “
Should the pile of rubble be asteroids, maybe? At a certain point it won’t matter if you are any where near the impact , of course.
10
posted on
09/24/2009 8:16:05 AM PDT
by
dynachrome
(I am Jim Thompson!)
To: presidio9
Damn, I didn’t see your post before I posted mine. Oh well, great minds.....
To: Little Pig
Now, a bigger asteroid, like 500 meters or more, and its game over.
No we could probably take a hit by a half kilometer job. It would mess the place up quite a bit, but it wouldn't be a species ender. It wouldn't even mess up the climate for more than a very short period of time.
The Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event (AKA T-Rex be gone) was estimated to be over 10km. And even that didn't kill off everything. The dinosaurs died out, but they didn't have canned food. It won't be pleasant and you would probably loose 90% of humanity if we took a hit from another 10km object today. But that would still have 600,000 humans around to repopulate the planet.
12
posted on
09/24/2009 8:20:47 AM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world, and they are all out to get me.)
To: presidio9
13
posted on
09/24/2009 8:24:39 AM PDT
by
sunny48
To: presidio9
“And the disciples said to Jesus, ‘Tell us how our end will be.’
And Jesus said, ‘Have you discovered the beginning that you should inquire of the end? For where the beginning is, there shall be the end.’” —Gospel of Thomas
14
posted on
09/24/2009 8:28:40 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: presidio9
ASTEROID SLAMS EARTH
_______________________________WOMEN, MINORITIES HARDEST HIT
15
posted on
09/24/2009 8:36:42 AM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
in real terms 500 meters is small yet it would doom us. And it might be much larger. They need a real plan to intercept these things and change the trajectory.
16
posted on
09/24/2009 8:37:40 AM PDT
by
Williams
To: presidio9
A dedicated space telescope would fix this problem, (early warning) but such a mission could cost more than a billion dollars. I'd say that's an infinitely wiser investment than Cash for Clunkers.
17
posted on
09/24/2009 8:44:17 AM PDT
by
Ditto
To: dynachrome
Great book. IIRC Niven did it alone and not in concert with Gerry Pournelle. They worked wonderfully together on many books, espeially Footfall.
To: presidio9
"With a three-day warning, you can walk away and be safe. But it scares me, given how poorly we've handled things of this nature in the past," he says, citing the failure to fully evacuate New Orleans ahead of hurricane Katrina in 2005." "We need GREYHOUNDS damn it!"
19
posted on
09/24/2009 8:47:35 AM PDT
by
Jaxter
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum.)
To: DCBryan1
this is hugh and series..........
20
posted on
09/24/2009 8:49:41 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(I am racist, hear me roar....I don't give a crap anymore....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson