Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor: No state parks to close (reduced hrs. for campgrounds/facilities, less bathroom cleaning)
SFGate.com ^ | 9/25/09 | Peter Fimrite

Posted on 09/25/2009 4:54:22 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

(09-25) 16:05 PDT SACRAMENTO -- Under fire from park supporters and the state's own attorneys, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said today that no state parks will be completely closed to help solve the state's budget woes.

Instead, the governor's new plan, which some say is little more than a shell game to save face, would slash $14.2 million from the park budget this year by closing campgrounds and facilities on weekdays, reducing seasonal and administrative staff and cutting back on things like bathroom cleaning.

The idea is to allow all 279 state parks to remain open this fiscal year. More options would be explored Jan. 10 when legislators consider next year's budget, according to a statement released this afternoon.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; iou; schwarzenegger; stateparks

1 posted on 09/25/2009 4:54:22 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If they closed state parks, would they have guards to keep people out?


2 posted on 09/25/2009 4:55:50 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If they “closed” state parks, where would all the animals go? Would the trees have to stop growing?


3 posted on 09/25/2009 4:56:23 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Meanwhile they keep leasing expensive cars and paying teachers not to work.


4 posted on 09/25/2009 4:57:02 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

lo to both of your posts.


5 posted on 09/25/2009 4:57:53 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

That’s LOL to both your posts. ARgh!&(^!!!


6 posted on 09/25/2009 4:58:27 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

$14.2 million will save the state from a $26 billion dollar deficit. Oh thank you Super(fluous)man.

Schwarzenegger continues on to be one the most clueless underachieving political disappointments in U.S. history.


7 posted on 09/25/2009 4:58:36 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Ded Kennedy, Stealing from the middle class for nearly 40 years to end poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

OH NO!!! Not bathroom closings. What will the bears do? Are the woods closed? We need a law.


8 posted on 09/25/2009 4:59:13 PM PDT by Indy Pendance (Live Free Or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I don’t know why they can’t just raise the fees at the parks.

It was always a stupid plan to close them.


9 posted on 09/25/2009 5:02:34 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

How about work-release prisoners running the park maintenance and other services at the parks...modeled on Sheriff Arapaio.


10 posted on 09/25/2009 5:02:46 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pointsal

Maybe they should tax the Mexican drug plantations that are growing in state parks.


11 posted on 09/25/2009 5:03:48 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

why dont they cuts something besides bathroom cleaning. its like healthcare...they want to cut services but not pork


12 posted on 09/25/2009 5:08:04 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What a tough choice: money to illegals, money to our state parks. Money to illegals, money to our state parks.

Am I missing something here? Did it really take the governator this long to make a decision.

Kennedy-itis...no ability to compose even a simple thought.


13 posted on 09/25/2009 5:13:47 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Time for Operation Wetback Part 2.


14 posted on 09/25/2009 5:34:41 PM PDT by troy McClure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Mostly US Forest Service land is the landlord of choice.... You would be shocked to see drip hose in the boonies. At that point, be real careful where you walk.


15 posted on 09/25/2009 5:39:09 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

I don’t think they should charge fees at all. It’s public land. We all pay our taxes.


16 posted on 09/25/2009 6:03:52 PM PDT by Marie2 (The second mouse gets the cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

LOL


17 posted on 09/25/2009 9:12:21 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson