The rules you cited were a few bullet points that are so broadly defined as to permit any outcome. How they differ from the other specific treatises is beyond the capability of FR posts. However, when faced with a decision as to whether your broad principles of hermaneutics are wrong or your conclusions are wrong I believe the latter.
I am not a politician because I have actually read the bill.
I said that the bullet points were an overview. The basic premise remains. In the same scripture passage, two exact phrases cannot mean different things. Exodus 20. It refers specifically to Genesis 1. Please address this.