Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Sept. Payroll Losses Accelerate To 263,000 (unemployement 9.8%)
fox business ^

Posted on 10/02/2009 5:40:51 AM PDT by Perdogg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-199 last
To: Perdogg
Photobucket
181 posted on 10/02/2009 12:03:50 PM PDT by kara2008 (The Answer to 1984 is 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Hey Huck, I lived through those years. The down turn was a result of the Johnson refusal to fund the war and the Great Society programs. The Carter years sucked, don't go by charts go by experience.

Reagan made us feel good about ourselves and we pulled out of the Rat Fail mode.

182 posted on 10/02/2009 12:15:31 PM PDT by Little Bill (Carol Che-Porter is a MOONBAT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Well, I high-balled it a bit. I was thinking total un/underemployment would hit 20% this month, but it’s only at 17%, UP from %16.7% last month. See the link, U-6 data line, go all the way to the right...

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm

Anyhow, we should be in full-blown crisis mode by December. (I’m adjusting my estimates, just as 0bama & Crew are allowed to do each month by the Media.)


183 posted on 10/02/2009 12:36:03 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

Here you go:

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm


184 posted on 10/02/2009 12:37:45 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Huck

“I wonder if folks round here will use the U-6 number when the GOP is back in charge.”

I will. I’ve been in retail for the past decade. I watch them like a hawk no matter WHO is in the White House, because we have so many, many IDIOTS in Congress. And that fact NEVER seems to change, LOL!


185 posted on 10/02/2009 12:44:17 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

I lived through the Carter years too. They did suck. I think we’re in a 70s cycle now. Unfortunately, we’re only in the 74-75 phase. I took all the way to 84 for things to turn around. It’s a cyclical bear.


186 posted on 10/02/2009 12:59:32 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

The Nixon Ford years sucked too.


187 posted on 10/02/2009 1:00:13 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

That’s true.


188 posted on 10/02/2009 1:00:36 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Huck

We started ‘guirding our loins’ in retail last year already.

You snooze, you lose. :)


189 posted on 10/02/2009 1:04:07 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Don't bet in a down market, what came first Nixon or the communist.

Nixon was a Country Club Republican and thought that FDR was right and tried to emulate him, wrong move.

190 posted on 10/02/2009 1:28:55 PM PDT by Little Bill (Carol Che-Porter is a MOONBAT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

Nixon was an awful president in every way.


191 posted on 10/02/2009 2:00:12 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

I haven’t heard an idiotic comment out of Biden in weeks.

I feel like I’ve been cheated.


192 posted on 10/02/2009 4:28:19 PM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Riley

...you missed today’s..: “I want to reincarnate as a Puerto Rican”..????


193 posted on 10/02/2009 4:43:06 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: ExTxMarine

I’d call it “racist” myself.


194 posted on 10/02/2009 6:05:51 PM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

I think U6 it was 8-9% during Bush (double check on it), while U1 was 5-6%.


195 posted on 10/02/2009 7:32:12 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Huck

1975 rates figured the ‘old’ way or the U6 way
1975 rates were not 17 percent.

you chart even shows that this is over 1975. And its far worse because just as fdr didn’t handle the 1930s right, this too is not being handled right and will continue to get worse.


196 posted on 10/02/2009 9:21:11 PM PDT by genxer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: genxer
U6 data is actually the newer data. If you notice, you can't find U6 data before 1994. But it doesn't matter. The U6 number is higher than the U3 number, but they track the same way. When one is up, the other is up, so either number is fine for comparing decade to decade or year to year, as long as you use the same data for comparison.

Right now, we're worse off than 74-75, we're right at the level we were at in Reagan's first term, 83-84. I just read that in 1984 West Virginia unemployment was 15%. Did you know that?

We've got a ways to go before we hit Depression levels. We may get there. I would quibble with you about saying the situation isn't being "handled right." I believe it's far worse than that. I think it's CRIME that is taking place, and it didn't start in 2008. I think it's been going on for some time. Ever notice how it doesn't matter which party is in power, Goldman Sachs always has people on the inside? Ever wonder why? You think only one party can be corrupted?

197 posted on 10/02/2009 9:28:02 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
The U.S. labor market weakened in September as 263,000 payroll jobs were lost and the unemployment rate rose a tenth to a 26-year high of 9.8%

if each tenth of a percent equals approximately 250,000, my public school math tells me that at 10% unemployment there would be 25 million people unemployed. I sure hope the folks in the stock market take appropriate action. Without tax cuts, something that won't happen while Obama is in office, and 25 million unemployed and growing, we're screwed for the foreseeable future.

198 posted on 10/03/2009 8:10:04 PM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I’ll bet it’s higher.


199 posted on 10/04/2009 3:40:05 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Liberal sacred cows make great hamburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-199 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson