1 posted on
10/05/2009 2:59:23 AM PDT by
Scanian
To: Scanian
So how do we get this info to the author? It is the presentation in pdf and ppt of the presentation given at Oshkosh by renowned aeronautical engineer and pioneer Burt Rutan totaly blowing away the AGW myth. The pages are full of his speaking notes and descriptions of the charts and analysis for all to understand. He totally obliterates the hockey stick thoery.
http://rps3.com/Pages/Burt_Rutan_on_Climate_Change.htm
2 posted on
10/05/2009 3:29:20 AM PDT by
mazda77
(Rubio for US Senate)
To: Scanian; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; ...
3 posted on
10/05/2009 3:52:24 AM PDT by
steelyourfaith
(Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison!)
To: Scanian; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; SideoutFred; ...
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
4 posted on
10/05/2009 3:53:23 AM PDT by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: Scanian
McIntyre analyzed the CRU archive Yamal data and proved that Briffa et al. had cherry-picked and manipulated data, intentionally omitting records not friendly to their position. In fact, when Briffas hand-selected figures were replaced by a broader dataset for the same Polar Ural region (much of which he had deliberately dropped), the Hockey-Stick suddenly disappeared, revealing no significant trend in the 20th century whatsoever! In Steves new graph, below, the Red represents the original 12 cherry picked Yamal trees, while the Black incorporates the broader Yamal dataset.
It is actually much worse than just the ridiculously tiny set of 12 cherry picked trees. When you examine the data from those trees, you discover than almost all the bogus hockey stick signal is the result of data from a single tree! YAD061 (data highlighted in yellow) is one hell of a magical trillion dollar tree.
5 posted on
10/05/2009 4:16:56 AM PDT by
Jeff F
(austinaero; Phoenix11; WaterBoard)
To: Scanian
iven these natural shifts over the past 1000 years, its certainly not surprising that after a period of cooling, which followed a period of warming, wed again enter a period of warming. Tide's come in, tide's go out ... if the process was slower DEM's would be screaming about how the earth will be flooded... followed by how the ocean's were going away forever.
Ebb and flow - dems would milk it...
9 posted on
10/05/2009 5:43:18 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(MSM BIAS: the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell)
To: Scanian
10 posted on
10/05/2009 10:32:26 AM PDT by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson