Skip to comments.
Airline asks passengers to use the toilet before boarding... and help cut carbon emissions
Daily Mail ^
| 06th October 2009
Posted on 10/06/2009 8:27:25 AM PDT by llevrok
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Dewey Revoltnow
You gotta be sh*ttin me :)
21
posted on
10/06/2009 8:49:46 AM PDT
by
MotorCityBuck
(Page 73, Johnson, Navin)
To: Moonman62
22
posted on
10/06/2009 8:54:27 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
( I am rolling over in my grave and I am not even dead yet.)
To: llevrok
if every time one of these goofy stories hit the wire, each and every one of us went out and burned an old tire, do ya think they’d knock it off?
To: llevrok
It’s a Zero-sum proposition. In order to produce 63.7kg of urine, the passengers would have to consume about 70 kg of liquid refreshment.
24
posted on
10/06/2009 8:58:58 AM PDT
by
CholeraJoe
(Member of AARP - Armed And Really Pi$$ED!)
To: CharlesWayneCT
No, I don’t think so.
You really want the likes of Michael Moore naked on an airplane?
25
posted on
10/06/2009 8:59:41 AM PDT
by
stylin_geek
(Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
To: llevrok
I normally go to the restroom before boarding a plane anyway. I prefer to not have to use an airplane restroom!
26
posted on
10/06/2009 9:04:20 AM PDT
by
pnz1
To: Anti-Kenyan
Good point.......
I’ve always wondered what the weight savings would be if the carpeting and all of those magazines and B.S. reading material were removed from the aircraft.
Make fat people (excuse....obese) buy two seats (try sitting next to some whale for 9 hours whose body flops over into your paid for space).... I’m sorry but if you’re wider than this sign here you must purchase two seats - kind of like height requirements for amusement rides.
Get draconian with luggage - don’t laugh. We had severe restrictions on weight when flying to Iraq and Afghanistan. You can pack sufficiently with a 44 lb. bag and one 14. lb carry-on.
NASA figured this out years back when the white paint applied to the monstrous external fuel tank was eliminated. I believe they gained another 11,000 lb.of payload in return - or something to that effect.
27
posted on
10/06/2009 9:06:52 AM PDT
by
LFOD
(Presently - Back in Dixie)
To: Moonman62
May I take your trident, sir?
28
posted on
10/06/2009 9:15:04 AM PDT
by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: llevrok
29
posted on
10/06/2009 9:17:50 AM PDT
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: llevrok
Why not issue diuretics at the counter?
30
posted on
10/06/2009 9:19:00 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: llevrok
All Nippon Airways says passengers who empty their bladders before boarding will help reduce carbon emissions
Actually, a great many of those bladders are filled by the liquids consumed at airport restaurants and snack and liquor bars. Then there is the water fountain. And they need to consider the drinks brought on board by the airline itself for distribution or sales during flight. And, it's not just the drinks. What about the food people consume just prior to boarding the planes?
It seems that if they were really serious, the would ban all of those areas in the airport and on the plane that tempt people to "fill up".
31
posted on
10/06/2009 9:36:49 AM PDT
by
adorno
(5)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson