Obama to Deliver Homosexual Keynote Address

The New American ^ | 2009-10-06 | Rebecca Terrell

[rabscuttle385]

President Barak Obama is scheduled to deliver the keynote address at a dinner sponsored by Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a homosexual civil rights organization, on Saturday, October 10.

HRC calls itself the "nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization" in the country. This weekend's event, the 13th Annual National Dinner for HRC, will be held at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, D.C. HRC expects more than 3,000 attendees.

Also on the program line-up is the presentation of the Edward M. Kennedy National Leadership Award, a newly created distinction named in honor of the late senator from Massachusetts, whom HRC memorializes with the appellation "champion in the fight for LGBT equality." Congressman Patrick Kennedy (D – R.I.) will present the award to Judy and Dennis Shepard. HRC says it plans to make this an annual award to distinguish a "unique and valued leader in the fight for LGBT equality."

HRC President Joe Solmonese expressed his pleasure at Obama's participation in the event since Obama has "called upon our nation to embrace LGBT people as brothers and sisters." He said that Senator Edward Kennedy was the president's "friend and mentor," remarking on the appropriateness of Obama's address on a night the group will honor the late senator's memory. He said Obama will carry on Kennedy's unfinished work — "equal rights for the LGBT community, and for every person who believes in liberty and justice for all."

Solmonese's latest remarks are more complimentary than those he made in an open letter to Obama in June after the Justice Department upheld the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in a lawsuit filed by a homosexual couple. Solmonese expressed feelings that Obama had betrayed the LGBT movement despite strongly supportive statements issued by the White House in favor of the LGBT agenda, and despite the administration's proclaiming June 2009 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month. Solmonese made his wishes clear, saying, "We call on you to put your principles into action and send legislation repealing DOMA to Congress."

Within days of the HRC letter, the Obama administration announced it would extend benefits to domestic partners of federal employees. In September, the president included homosexual partners raising children in his proclamation of Family Day 2009.

This week, a city councilman introduced a bill to allow same-sex marriages in Washington D.C.

[Beckwith]

This guy is on the down, down-low.

[Zionist Conspirator]

Daniel 11:37 says that the antichrist will have no desire for women. Would that mean that he is "gay"?

There is no "antichrist" in the Book of Daniel.

[Bushwacker777]

Is that a she-male watching him eat that thing?

[MarineMom613]

Slightly O/T

Did Kennedy finish his time in rehab or did his fathers’ passing give him a free pass. This guy should not be in any Public Office. He’s got some empty rooms upstairs.

[thecraw]

There is no "antichrist" in the Book of Daniel.

Daniel called him the "willful king." Call him what you want - the coming world leader, the man of sorrows, etc. - he's there.

[VOA]

bump

[glorgau]

How many times will he use the words “I” and “me”?

[Marysecretary]

Yep, if it’s something God hates, Obama loves it.

[Zionist Conspirator]

Okay. Not wanting to start a fight, just to remind everyone that the Book of Daniel is a Jewish book.

Love your screen name. "Not 'craw!' 'Craw!!!'"

[thecraw]

Not wanting to start a fight, just to remind everyone that the Book of Daniel is a Jewish book.

As was/is Y'shua Ha Moshiach, Jesus the Messiah.

Not Craw, Craw! ;-)

[Zionist Conspirator]

As was/is Y'shua Ha Moshiach, Jesus the Messiah.

::Sigh:: Once again, chr*stianity projects J*sus into the Book of Daniel, just as moslems project Mohammed and mormons project Joseph Smith into the religions they supposedly "fulfill"/"complete," whatever.

[ChrisInAR]

More FReepers might pay attention to it if they dropped their Ron Paul/Lew Rockwell-line opposition to moslem/Communist terrorists.

I think it's safe to say that TNA, Rep. Paul, & Lew Rockwell have no problem w/ defending our nation against "Moslem/Communist terrorists"...the question is how to go about it.

Anyone who understands the Constitution can figure out that national defense is one of the prime, if not the #1, priorities of the federal government. TNA & these 2 men believe that our military is for DEFENSE & that we should have a foreign policy similar to what the Founding Fathers had (wasn't it Jefferson who said, "Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none"?).

Om the other hand, the Neocon leadership of the GOP (& yes, the Dim Party, too; especially CFR member Joe Lieberman) believe that the world is ours & we should have free reign to "make the world safe for democracy"...which I think was a quote from Karl Marx. They believe that it is our job to stamp out tyranny around the globe when it suits their interests.

I will take the word of the Founding Fathers over those of Lieberman, Bush, & Clinton ANY DAY: the US should mind its own business in foreign affairs & not draw the ire of Islamic nutcases in the 1st place....& when we are attacked, destroy the enemy, take no prisoners, & do it QUICKLY.

[thecraw]

Once again, chr*stianity projects J*sus into the Book of Daniel, just as moslems project Mohammed and mormons project Joseph Smith into the religions they supposedly "fulfill"/"complete," whatever

The difference being of course that Muhammad and Smith were ordinary, sinful men. Y'shua was neither...

Shalom.

[Zionist Conspirator]

The difference being of course that Muhammad and Smith were ordinary, sinful men. Y'shua was neither...

Yes, this is what chr*stianity believes. It is not self-evidently true.

If you already believe the "new testament," you're naturally going to see J*sus all over the Hebrew Bible. But if you don't already believe this, he just isn't there.

[Zionist Conspirator]

the US should mind its own business in foreign affairs & not draw the ire of Islamic nutcases in the 1st place

How do we "draw the ire of islamic nutcases?" By supporting Israel?

Wow. If we support Israel the muzzies won't like us. This sounds like the same logic the Lefties used to use against Rhodesia and South Africa. But for some reason when it comes to Israel, the "palaeocons" start spouting it.

You must really love Obama's Middle East policy.

[thecraw]

If you already believe the "new testament," you're naturally going to see J*sus all over the Hebrew Bible. But if you don't already believe this, he just isn't there.

It's been said that. "The Old Testament is the New Testament concealed, the New Testament is the Old Testament Revealed."

Then of course, there's the self-evident Isaiah 53... :-)

[MinuteGal]

Back to the topic at hand;

"Obama to Deliver Homosexual Keynote Address"

How much does anyone want to bet that this is one speech the mainstream TV media will choose NOT to broadcast to the nation?

Leni

[thecraw]

Back to the topic at hand; "Obama to Deliver Homosexual Keynote Address"

Yes, indeed...

[Zionist Conspirator]

It's been said that. "The Old Testament is the New Testament concealed, the New Testament is the Old Testament Revealed."

This is what chr*stianity claims. This does not make it true. In fact, if one isn't a priori committed to believing chr*stianity in the first place, it isn't "self evident" at all.

Then of course, there's the self-evident Isaiah 53... :-)

What makes you think that Isaiah 53 is a prophecy of J*sus? Just because chr*stianity believes this does not make it so. I'm sorry if this is news to you.

What do you do with the Torah? Chuck it all because Isaiah 53 is a supposedly "higher revelation?"

Arguing with you people is like arguing with evolutionists. You believe what you believe because you believe it, but you think that your beliefs are "obviously true" when they are no such thing.

[thecraw]

Arguing with you people is like arguing with evolutionists. You believe what you believe because you believe it, but you think that your beliefs are "obviously true" when they are no such thing.

Thank you. I've never been compared to an evolutionist before but there is a first time for everything I suppose. This is arguing?

Most of us Christians (a/k/a "you people") also believe that the Bible is Truth, breathed from God, from the first letter in Genesis to the last letter in Revelation. We believe this because we are indwelled by the Holy Spirit, and believe Y'shua to be the Messiah, who is the ultimate sacrifice for all sin, for Jews and Gentiles alike. A relationship with Y'shua doesn't make any of us superior to anyone else; but simply forgiven, by God's grace alone.

That being said, most of us realize that we and religious Jews both worship the God of Israel, and we love our Jewish brothers and sisters as ourselves, as God commands. Shalom.