So, what’s the problem????
Fair enough (I thought there was a very expensive emulsion that Du Pont developed for this kind of situation?), but then neither he nor his family should be able to turn around and sue about the results.
This seems fair enough, on the surface at least.
Nice. The State wants to force treatment on a criminal so that he will live, but they are going to cut Grandma’s medicaid because we can’t afford it. This world is truly upside down.
The article referenced doesn’t give many details but for over thirty years open heart surgery has been done without blood transfusions and with good results.
So serious surgical procedures can be done without transfusions and thus avoid any side effects from transfused blood. But maybe this guy is too ill to consider it in his case.
A doctor at the prison said in court papers that Lindsey is in “imminent danger” of dying if he does not have a transfusion.
We would not want to infringe upon this fine citizen’s First Amendment Rights, now would we?
Especially at the taxpayers expense.