Good job. Let us know what they say. We have to get at least one state check in 2012 and beyond. This is insane.
My only suggestion would be to expand it to have adequate documentation required of any candidate for any federal office with constitutional requirements for age or citizenship. That way it doen’t sound like you are singling out anyone in particular. We really do need this for Senators and Representatives as well as for POTUS and VPOTUS.
This is a much better place to focus our efforts than trying to do anything about what happened in 2008.
From the desk of cc2k: |
"Since allegiance of the potential President and Commander-in-Chief was the main concern of the Founding Fathers, 'Natural Born Citizen' has been understood to mean meeting the following two requirements: . You must be born in the United States; on US soil and . Both of your parents must be U.S. citizens at the time of your birth."
This is not accurate. I realize many of you have convinced yourselves it is, but that doesn't make it so. If you leave it in it's going to scream "Birther" and may actually make the letter counter-productive.
All you need to say is that a candidate should submit documentation proving his eligibility for the office.
Well done. Thank you!!!
I am no constitutional expert but I dont think that is what it says particularly this part: of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty.
I believe that the 14 amendment views anyone born in the US as automatically a citizen regardless of the parents status (with one exception for foreign diplomats stationed in the US).
There are two legal principals regarding citizenship that is not gained through naturalization. The first is jus sanguines witch is (the law of blood) which automatically confers full citizenship to anyone born to two US citizens anywhere in the world. The second is jus soli the (law of place) which automatically confers full citizenship on anyone born within the US. These principals have been around for a long time and there is a ton of legal president and jurisprudence which is based on them.
The Supreme Court has never defined the term Natural Born because the issue has never come up before. I suspect they would view anyone born in the US or anyone born to two US citizens as a natural born citizen.
Under jus sanguines (the law of blood) the citizenship of the parents is critical to conveying citizenship. Under is jus soli the (law of place) the nationality of the parents is completely irrelevant as we see today with illegal immigrants and their US citizen offspring.
Good Luck.
1.) All documents presented, shall be made available for public scrutiny within (yadda, yadda, )days etc...
2.) Challenges by state's citizens to the validity of submitted documents shall be reviewed and (yadda, yadda, yadda)........
3.) Candidates shall make available for pubic scrutiny all school records, police records, court records etc.....
problem is that such laws exist already in reality. NJ for example allowed a man who was not a us citizen on the ballot with a green card.
The Secretary of each state has the reproducibility to verify the candidate before they are put on a ballot in their state.
What would be most beneficial at this point is a clear understanding by everyone of what exactly a “natural born citizen” is.
Obama himself never claimed to be a “natural born citizen”, but rather a “native citizen” on his fight the smears web page for example.