Posted on 10/08/2009 7:22:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
She's poised to become the best-selling author in the United States, has a devoted base of conservative supporters and is considered a front-runner to lead the Republicans into the next election in 2012 - and yet key party strategists are tormented by the popularity of Sarah Palin.
The very notion of a Palin candidacy has been derided in recent days by some of the brightest minds in the Republican party even as the former governor of Alaska outlines her policies on Afghanistan, energy and other issues of national importance.
"Were she to be the nominee, we could have a catastrophic election," Steve Schmidt, John McCain's presidential campaign manager last year, said recently.
He was backed by Mike Murphy, a Republican media consultant who also made a point of chastising Schmidt for his role in Palin's rise to international prominence to begin with.
"Steve Schmidt correct about Sarah Palin and '12," Murphy said by way of his Twitter feed. "Shame he didn't feel same way a year ago when he was lobbying McCain to choose her as VP."
John Weaver, McCain's closest political adviser for years, also weighed in earlier this week about a Palin candidacy.
"It would surely mean a political apocalypse is upon us," he said.
Yet from her unlikely pulpit - Facebook, and not the governor's office in Wasilla, Alaska - Palin is getting her message out on everything from health-care reform and energy while assailing President Barack Obama for his position on Afghanistan. Many of her 900,000-plus "friends" on the social networking site are cheering her every word.
Her star quality is undisputed - a Canadian is so confident of her popularity that he's selling an Xbox 360 autographed by Palin for US$1.1 million on eBay.(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
lol They should be worried. We are sick of them, too!
Were she to be the nominee, we could have a catastrophic election,” Steve Schmidt, John McCain’s presidential campaign manager.
LOL, thats pretty funny when you read it again and realized who said it.
She’s the ONLY reason Juan McCrazy didn’t have a McGovern-like implosion.
“Were she to be the nominee, we could have a catastrophic election,” Steve Schmidt, John McCain’s presidential campaign manager last year, said recently.
Good grief! We have a catastrophe right now because she wasn’t elected to office.
I don't consider the people who advised a looser like McCain to be key Republican strategists"
LOL, thats pretty funny when you read it again and realized who said it.
Yah, fairly 'catastrophic' for the political class .... /LOL
Republican strategists (RINOs) persistent fecklessness chafes key Palin grassroots supporters.
There. Much more accurate. And meaningful.
All Palin has to do is post a Facebook note on which city she'll be in to give a campaign speech, and the people will go in droves. It will drive the MSM bonkers because they can't ignore 50,000+ people attending a Palin rally.
More and more, it makes perfect sense for Palin to abandon the Stupid Party and run as a true Independent. She has the record of reform and she has the voters who are angry at both parties. She doesn't need to go through the puppet strings of the primaries only for liberals to crossover and vote for the most RINO candidate because the Stupid Party is too stupid to fix their primary system.
Moderates and liberals hate conservatives.
Again I have the extreme honor of sending a post your way...
I’m just going to repeat my last one...
“If anyone would know...you would..I cant think of a better endorsment”
some people think the reason the establishment GOP doesn’t like Sarah is because if she were to be elected she’ll expose their own corruption and/or stop their gravy trains.
But i think it is because the establishment is in agreement with the RATS on how to change the country. Look how they shoved McCain down our throats when there were so many other contenders that the party electorate liked better.
Maybe but these "strategists" haven't really proven lately that they know anything about strategy, have they?
I agree. Great point.
What an idiot.
Naaa, she is much hotter than RR.
45 years ago..
Nelson Rockefeller told his staff that, in the words of his public relations head, Stuart Spencer, "We had to destroy Barry Goldwater as a member of the human race."
Purveyors of hate, declared Gov. Scranton about Goldwater and supporters. George Romney agreed stating, "There is no place in either of our great political parties for the purveyors of hate who, from time to time in nations the world over put on their brown or black or red shirts, flex their police-state muscles and cry for someone's blood."
Today..
Chief RINO tells his staff, "We have to destroy Sarah Palin as a member of the human race."
'dem liberal guys don't change do they?
Who was the sage that said “without Palin, Barr would have come in second?”
Ooops posted to the wrong thread, which is a bad thing to do when your post calls somebody an idiot.
The idiot I was referring to was on this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2358061/posts
**LOL, thats pretty funny when you read it again and realized who said it.**
Yo, Schmidtty... if not for PALIN... your boy JUAN McLAME would have only scored as well as MONDALE in ‘84
Good.
Gee Schmidt who are the "WE" you speak of? Could it be the RATS, RINOS and YOU?
I do hope so!
"Were she to be the nominee, we could have a catastrophic election,"
Catastrophic for rinos. About damn time for their fate to befall them.
.
The main problem with Palin is that she is Phenomenally popular with us, the Base of the GOP, but polls horribly with independents, moderates, swing voters, and Women.
What she needs to do between now and 2012 is change her image with key general election voting groups. Most of the negative image they have of her is blatantly false and the result of a successful liberal propaganda and smear campaign against her.
Leaving the Governorship of Alaska will prove to either be the greatest political move in decades or it will go down as the greatest blunder ever.
If she can prove to the General Electorate she is ready to lead on day 1 and has what it takes to Govern, she will be unstoppable. If she doesn’t and still get’s the nomination, we will be looking at a Goldwater sized loss.
"Were she to be the nominee, we could have a catastrophic election," Steve Schmidt, John McCain's presidential campaign manager last year, said recently.
VERY CATASTROPHIC FOR McCAIN IF THE DIPSHIITE IS DUMB ENOUGH TO TRY TO GET THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION OVER PALIN.
I simply won't vote for a RINO.
She won’t lose because of lack of funds. See my tagline.
I think all the nay-sayers are RHINOS, they either need to get out of the way, shut-up, or get run over. May even be best if they got run out of the true republican party.
Pfft. When did Obama prove he could lead from day one? And for pete’s sakes she left the governorship for excellent reasons.
I think by 2012 they’ll be howling for Sarah. And when these RINOs see what happens in 2010, they’d best keep their mouths shut and get out of the way.
Wrong!
Palin is gonna help us take back the party that we built and they stole!
“I simply won’t vote for a RINO.”
Yeah...that worked out so well for everyone that did that this past election. I don’t know how many made the choice to not vote for McCain, but if was 2.2% or 3.5 million then we would at least have someone in office who had made executive level decisions before. This clown we have now can’t make up his mind on anything.
“Look how they shoved McCain down our throats when there were so many other contenders that the party electorate liked better.”
#####
Which begs the question, what specifically in the logistics and structure of the Republican presidential primary allows them to game the system, against the will of the voters?
“What she needs to do between now and 2012 is change her image with key general election voting groups.”
Wrong...she is not running in 2012. She is supporting candidates. She never planned to run. In stepping down she put her State first. She understands she is controversial and will use that position to encourage the conservative base. The Conservative base is still not ACTIVE. This teaparty thing could barely be considered being active. Look at the other side...24x7x365...fighting for socialism.
“ome people think the reason the establishment GOP doesn’t like Sarah is because if she were to be elected she’ll expose their own corruption and/or stop their gravy trains.
But i think it is because the establishment is in agreement with the RATS on how to change the country. Look how they shoved McCain down our throats when there were so many other contenders that the party electorate liked better.
14 posted on Thu Oct 8 18:37:28 2009 by uncitizen “
This is what she did here in Alaska and the mainstream pubbies are still pissed, blaming her for every one of their failures. As recently as tuesday on the local radio show, the host was attributing the failures of the previous republican administration to “the lovely and gracious Sarah P” as they call her.
The media sure did a job of Borking her-I don’t know if she can run as a candidate, but she can bring in crowds and support, which the present crop of candidates need desperately. I can’t believe that these morons are the best and brighest.
vaudine
Ha! Republicans my right eye! RINO’s! Pretenders! Democrats all but the LABEL!
Sarah has grassroots support these bozo’s scoffed at — and STILL they scoff!
That is exactly what I am afraid of - McCain's judgment is about as decisive as the product of my dog's rectum - it rolls downhill...
and don’t forget...the leading cause... LOW VOTER TURNOUT
It baffles me that in a state like Texas the voter turnout for the primary was less than 10%. It doesn’t take very many people of a different mindset to screw up the nomination.
Note that on Nov 8, 2009 McCain received 4,479,328 votes. But total votes across all candidates on March 4, 2009 in the primary was 1,362,322. This is out of 14,780,857 eligible voters!!! The bulk of the problem is apathy...no one cares until it is too late.
Clinton was a total opposite of Bush, Reagan was a total opposite of Carter, Carter was a total opposite of Ford, and so on.
People will want substance over flowery talk, experience over change, and competence over personality in 2012.
I believe Palin can be that candidate, but she needs to prove that to the General Electorate, which is increasingly moderate, suburban, and female, all groups that she does not poll well with.
She has the base, heck she had us at “lipstick”, but she needs to change her perception with the people who actually decide elections, which is not by any means impossible. But she needs to start now.
If she can win over Independents, who are deserting Obama and the Democrats in droves, and dispel the many myths and outright lies about her, she will prove to be an unstoppable candidate.
She is actually in the same place Reagan was after 76’. The establishment of the GOP and the democrats had convinced most Americans that Reagan was a washed up actor who had no thoughts of his own and was virtually a puppet of his wealthy masters. They told us he would be an “apocalyptic” President.
But Reagan spent all of the time between 76’ and 80’ reintroducing himself to the American Public, proving his metal and intellect, and displaying that not only was he not a psychotic cowboy hellbent on bringing about Armageddon, but he was a man ready to lead and ready to Govern with solutions to restore America.
We have been here before. We can do it again.
Definition of “Catastrophic:” War hero with years of government service defeated by communist community organizer with no experience
In Huckabee’s case he doesn’t have the interest to see that the republicans have a strong candidate to take the senate next year. Has he done ANYTHING at all toward that end?
I agree. I think if she runs it will be 2016 or even 2020. Right now she can accomplish a lot behind the scenes, and of course that means she will have a lot of chips to cash in if she ever decides too.
I disagree. The one thing Sarah Palin must never do is change simply to appeal to a segment of voters. What she should do is what Reagan did, chart a steady course, her own course, and require the independents and voter segments to see her views as the right ones to support. The voters should come to Palin, Palin should not go to the voters.
It’s called leadership.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Wishful thinking, dude.
“...did you have any other questions?”
#####
Well certainly not for you.
It doesn't answer your question directly but it's obvious that they already know who the candidate will be before they even ask us.
Then they proceed to take down the contenders one by one via various methods. Again, i state the obvious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.