Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Admits Campaign Tensions Between Palin, Aides
Washington Post ^ | 10/11/2009 | Garance Franke-Ruta

Posted on 10/11/2009 8:23:33 AM PDT by Saije

Former presidential candidate John McCain (R-Ariz.) acknowledged on CNN's State of the Union Sunday that tensions flared during his campaign between senior strategist Steve Schmidt and those allied with his running mate, then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

"With a high-pressure situation, there's always tensions that develop within campaigns," McCain said in a video excerpt posted online. "And there were clearly tensions between Steve Schmidt and people in the Palin camp."

Schmidt has recently become a vocal public critic of Palin, predicting that a presidential run by her in 2012 would prove "catastrophic" for the Republican Party. McCain did not criticize Palin and called her an overall asset to his campaign for whom he still has affection.

"There are fundamental facts ... that cannot be denied," McCain said. "When we selected or asked Sarah Palin to be my running mate, it energized our party. We were ahead in the polls, until the stock market crashed. And she still is a formidable force in the Republican Party."

"And I have great affection for her," he continued. "Did we always agree on everything in the past? Will we in the future? No."

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; election; mccain; palin; tension
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: deannadurbin

There’s no way any other GOP candidate but W would’ve beaten either Gore or Kerry.


41 posted on 10/11/2009 8:45:34 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Saije

I blame McNut for King Obama’s election. That pile of sh!! is the most stubborn egotistical peace of dung that the Republicans ever admitted to allowing the R back of his name. Even so, I would rather have him as President than the communists leader King Obama. Palin would have been a fantastic VP and might have kept that nitwit in line.


42 posted on 10/11/2009 8:46:04 AM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

And we had warnings BEFORE the 2000 election too. Which is why the election was so close between Gore and Bush and had to be contested. A lot of TRUE CONSERVATIVES like myself knew what Bush was from the beginning. Our warnings fell on deaf ears.


43 posted on 10/11/2009 8:46:50 AM PDT by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

He didn’t stop it while it was going on during the campaign. So that to me speaks volumes especially when she was “going rogue” when she called the talks without the campaign knowing it. Sarah is too straight forward to have not made her concerns known when the two were at joint venues.


44 posted on 10/11/2009 8:46:56 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Saije

Sarah was McCain’s VP pick, and as such it was her duty, in normal circumstances, to do what he said and to listen to his handlers.

It’s only too obvious that McCain’s handlers deliberately sabotaged her from the first minute they met with her, setting her up for two rotten and stupidly chosen interviews, refusing to let her talk to the press, and so forth. Finally McCain intervened and replaced the handlers, but it was already too late.

And, of course, Sarah was STILL under orders from the Boss not to talk about matters that might have led to Obama’s defeat. Reverend Wright—out of bounds. Communist mentors and pals—out of bounds. Obama’s extreme abortion record—out of bounds. And so forth.

Hard to win an election when your hands are tied. In the circumstances, it’s amazing how well Sarah did.


45 posted on 10/11/2009 8:47:00 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

I THINK Pawlenty hired McKinnon. If any Republican hires Schmidt they should finish behind the Green candidate.


46 posted on 10/11/2009 8:47:10 AM PDT by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: classified
....He will be floating around attached to someone

You will be able to recognize him immediately; he'll be the one that will be attached by the nose in a RINO's rectum.

47 posted on 10/11/2009 8:47:38 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman (In Defense of Liberty.........Radicalism may be necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

I believe that is impossible to say. The Republicans nominated a one worlder “compassionate conservative”, which is a euphemism for “Democrat Lite”.

If we don’t learn our lessons from the past we are doomed to repeat them.

NO MORE RINOs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


48 posted on 10/11/2009 8:48:46 AM PDT by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Ramos and Campien were convicted in open court by a jury of their peers.
49 posted on 10/11/2009 8:48:54 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

They were railroaded.

Bush should have pardoned them both, on day one.


50 posted on 10/11/2009 8:49:38 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (2012: Repeal it all... All of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

The only good thing McCain did in recent years was to introduce America to Sarah Palin.
Yes, she “energized” the Party.
Yes, it MUST have become clear to McCain and his handlers
and strategists that her appeal gave the ticket several million more votes that it might not have had, millions more ENTHUSIASTIC votes. Enthusiasm of the kind McCain could never create on his own.
SO, acknowledging that fact, in the wake of defeat, is the factor that created all this animosity towards Sarah Palin, who is being blamed still for all the inadequacies of McCain himself.
I am sick and tired of McCain and his chauvinist-fool spokesmen, sick and tired of hearing them cling to this
conceit of theirs, thinking it’s a way to keep McCain ‘relevant’.
In the real world of electoral politics, McCain will NEVER be relevant again, if he ever was.
Just like a member of the other party, cowardly to the core, he cynically put a woman out there and sacrificed HER
for HIS ends. This makes me positively HATE John McCain, and explains why I cringe every time I see him or hear his asinine words quoted. He MUST be defeated.


51 posted on 10/11/2009 8:49:40 AM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paul544

PAWLENTY IS A LOSER, then!!! Mark McKinnon is a DEMOCRAT!! And he goes easy on the OPPONENETS BECAUSE OF IT!!


52 posted on 10/11/2009 8:50:53 AM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

HE SOLD HER DOWN THE RIVER FOR A PROMISE FROM THE CHOSEN ONE.


53 posted on 10/11/2009 8:50:55 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: deannadurbin
This whole sentiment that Palin will be disastrous for the Republican Party is ridiculous.

In one way, it is correct. Because those lackeys know she would clean house on both sides of the aisle. No more 'business as usual' - and they know it! No more elitism, they will be 'our servants'. Returning DC to the way it was designed for We the People.
54 posted on 10/11/2009 8:51:00 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: deannadurbin
If McCain had voted AGAINST TARP he would have won.

I think his behavior after the crisis became the big news is what sunk the ticket, leaving the campaign trial and going back to DC, threatening to cancel the first debate which was about three days away, and generally appearing panicky rather than calm. Clueless Obama looked better saying nothing for several days and just standing to the side.

I doubt many people specifically based their vote on McCain's supporting the bailout. Obama sure supported it, so there was no distinction there, just as there was no distinction between McCain and Obama on several major issues.

55 posted on 10/11/2009 8:51:15 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

“Timely observation.

Jeez - as bad as Obama is proving to be, about the only thing worse than him winning would have been McCain winning. And I worked on the McCain/Pailn campaign.

No more wasted nominations!”

It hurts me to say, but I agree. The blame for all of the s*** going on in D.C. will fall on the liberal anti-conservative movement. If Juan was elected and doing similar actions I do not think the sleeping giant would have awakened like it has to this magnitude.

Yes, Barry is way worse in terms of policies than Juan would have ever been. He is much more radical and really seems to hate America. But Carter brought us Reagan, so I have my hopes up.

I wasn’t happy about the last election until Palin jumped into the ring. I voted for her and no one else.


56 posted on 10/11/2009 8:51:17 AM PDT by digital-olive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yongin

McCain is following Obama’s playbook. Have your minions trash your foes, then stand above the fray and look like the adult.
_____

Exactly! He’s doing damage control because her book is coming out next month and just may make him look like a bigger fool than he already is.

I suspect Palin did not hark on the fact that he hung her out to dry as he cowered at the attempted crucifixion by the Lamestream Obama run media. But I bet she’ll have a subtle way of getting the point across at the treachery of Don Juan McCain.


57 posted on 10/11/2009 8:53:01 AM PDT by RowdyFFC (Nancy Pelosi...please deny her any health care....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
He didn’t stop it while it was going on during the campaign.

Which proves he lacked sufficient control of his campaign. There's a news flash!

58 posted on 10/11/2009 8:53:24 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
You are saying McCain is worse than Barry? Unbelievable!

There apparently is no concept of Liberty & Tyranny

59 posted on 10/11/2009 8:54:12 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman (In Defense of Liberty.........Radicalism may be necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cedric

With evidence withheld by Johnny Sutton. Do yourself a favor and get the “rest of the story” before parroting the media’s talking points. If you’d like to know much more, find research by Laura Ingraham and Megyn Kelly.


60 posted on 10/11/2009 8:54:50 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson