Posted on 10/13/2009 10:19:35 AM PDT by BGHater
Dispute of Paulson, Bernanke testimony
Court documents show that federal regulators were told about billions of dollars in bonuses awarded to Merrill Lynch executives during the company's takeover by Bank of America - contradicting statements to Congress by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and former Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr.
The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), in a brief filed in ongoing litigation with Bank of America Corp., said the bank informed the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve of the Merrill Lynch bonuses as early as Dec. 17 - weeks before the government approved a $20 billion bailout to help the takeover.
The document disputes oral and written testimony to Congress from Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Paulson, who both said they knew nothing about the $3.6 billion in bonuses before the bailout was approved in January.
Mr. Paulson, while under oath during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing July 16, was asked directly by Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, Maryland Democrat, whether he was "aware of the Merrill Lynch 3-plus billion dollars' worth of bonuses they were about to give out when this deal came down." His response: "No, I wasn't."
Mr. Bernanke, in a letter to the committee earlier this year, also suggested that the Federal Reserve didn't know about the bonuses before the bailout.
"Beginning on December 17, 2008, we participated in several discussions with management of Bank of America about its plans to acquire Merrill Lynch," Mr. Bernanke wrote. "The discussion did not encompass compensation levels or bonuses of Merrill Lynch employees."
The committee's top Republican, Rep. Darrell Issa of California, is demanding an explanation from Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Paulson.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
They lied, as all liberals do.
Well, this is easy. Since they are both Demoncrats, they simply “misspoke!” Solved it!
Sounds like perjury to me!
[Sounds like perjury to me!]
I have come to realize that my perfect hearing is not a defense against “misspoke,” so perjury can’t really even be mentioned.
Sorry, you are WAY off base here! /sarc
A flunky will take the wrap as a quid pro quo for the puppet masters.
And they act shocked that we don’t trust the government!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.