Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

Sheez does that thing ever look like an F-102 or an F-106. Not even a bubble canopy, for 360 vision. I wonder why we’ve given up on the delta-wing design, while the French consider it still viable.


2 posted on 10/15/2009 9:47:36 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FlyVet
I wonder why we’ve given up on the delta-wing design, while the French consider it still viable.

I read somewhere that a delta wing gives a very bumpy ride at low altitude. Not sure that's the reason. The Israelis did very well with Delta-wing Mirages & Kfirs. The F-106 was reportedly a good dogfighter when put up against the F-4 Phantom II.

General Dynamics developed a "cranked-delta" design with their F-16XL, but it got beat out for the strike bomber role by the F-15E Mudhen.

3 posted on 10/15/2009 10:05:30 PM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: FlyVet
I wonder why we’ve given up on the delta-wing design, while the French consider it still viable.

Americans are quitters?

French Rafale

Anglo/German Typhoon

Swedish Gripen

Indian Tejas

Chinese Vigorous Dragon

Maybe the question is why the USA is staying with the heritagw wingform?

4 posted on 10/15/2009 10:17:29 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (They have a saying in Chicago Mr Bond once happenstance, twice coincidence, three times enemy action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson