Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California appears poised to be first to ban power-guzzling big-screen TVs
LA Times BUSINESS ^ | Oct. 14,2009 | Marc Lifsher

Posted on 10/16/2009 12:32:57 PM PDT by Marty62

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: HiTech RedNeck

I’m always heartened to learn the spelling police are on their game.


21 posted on 10/16/2009 12:44:40 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

We should get about 1 million adults to go to Sacramento, dawn diapers, suck our thumbs, and stand out side the capital building demanding the state take over every aspect of our lives, in sarcasm.

The irony of it would be lost on many, but the visual would be something the media couldn’t help but cover, and the message would be so clear as to make the leftists absolutely furious.

White baby bonnets
White diapers
Bare Feet
Sucking thumbs
Big lollipops with different government programs printed on the side exposed to the cameras
Baby bottles with big government programs on them as well

On the fringe people could hand out fliers that say something like...

Please urge the state government to pass more gun control laws in addition to the thousands already on the books

Please urge the state to pass more seat belt laws

Please urge the state to pass more cell phone laws

Please urge the state to let prisoners go free

Please urge the state to raise our taxes

Please urge the state to...

Man this is fertile ground...


22 posted on 10/16/2009 12:45:15 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I can see it now. If this legislation passes, the wacko environmentalists will want to set up CHP checkpoints on I-40 and I-15 to stop all motorists and search for bootlegged big-screen TVs...lol. This legislation is totally unnecessary because the power consumption of TVs (and computers, appliances, etc.) is continually declining as technology improves.


23 posted on 10/16/2009 12:46:20 PM PDT by your local physicist (Gridlock is good...in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“And in the winter, the heat will be a boon not a bane.”

Exactly.


24 posted on 10/16/2009 12:46:26 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Yeah and we banned incandescent light bulbs before anyone else.

We are soooo screwed


25 posted on 10/16/2009 12:46:32 PM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Just remember that capital punishment is never carried out in a capitol.


26 posted on 10/16/2009 12:46:43 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

What’s more, we hear how this nation cannot have these things (or AC) anymore because they are “bad” for the environment and cause global climate change. Except now the rest of the world is finanlly ramping up to using cars (China and India) and rather than starting with the new “greener” technologies, they are using the same technologies that we can no longer use (got to get off of oil).

It isn’t about the environment or even scarcity of resources. The damned socialists have said for 40 years that “we consume too much of the world’s resources”, we have to do without.

We will have crappy low flow toilet, weak showerheads, no more control of our thermostats, and whatever size tv the government mandates.

It is unAmerican.


27 posted on 10/16/2009 12:47:18 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The character assassination of Rush Limbaugh is worse than what the Left accused Joe McCarthy of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: your local physicist

OK sooooo...
It’s a way of making a CA based company richer, by forcing eveyone to buy a NEW TV to comply with the STATE REGS. Ah yes, bend over everyone. Ca is geting ready to...... you fill in the blanks.


28 posted on 10/16/2009 12:47:18 PM PDT by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames
I can see it now, bootlegging big screens from outside Cali for major profits.

Will they have border inspections for Big Screens like they have for fruits/vegetables (California Border Protection Stations (BPS))?

29 posted on 10/16/2009 12:47:41 PM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
People will simply shop for this stuff outside of California. Nevada and Oregon should see a boost.

Actually, once it's illegal to buy them in-state the neighboring states will begin to ask for an ID to make sure they aren't violating some other law. At least that's what happened when buying oil-based paints was virtually banned several years ago.

30 posted on 10/16/2009 12:47:48 PM PDT by astrodude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
What will the Hollywood crowd do?

Keep buying bigger and bigger screens.
They are "the ruling class".
"Rules" don't apply to them.

31 posted on 10/16/2009 12:47:51 PM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

From trendsetter .. to laughingstock

sigh


32 posted on 10/16/2009 12:47:52 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAexile
"Kind of like what happens in NH when Mass. raises the cigarette taxes. Traffic jams on Rt’s 3, 93, 28 and 95. "

I remember reading last year (or earlier this year) that the MA state legislature was exploring ways to levy sales tax on items purchases made by MA residents in NH. How they were going to do that, was anyone's guess. But, I don't put anything past liberals when collecting taxes.

Did you see that story and do you know if it actually went anyplace?

33 posted on 10/16/2009 12:48:04 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Another thing to consider, California has a billion dollar industry in motion pictures. They want to see people GO to the movies and not watch them at home.

Eradicating home theaters is one way to accomplish this goal.


34 posted on 10/16/2009 12:48:26 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The character assassination of Rush Limbaugh is worse than what the Left accused Joe McCarthy of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the long march

I did that to may stores in the late 70’s and 80’s. Profit ya know. Started it to save energy costs so I could keep my employees.


35 posted on 10/16/2009 12:49:11 PM PDT by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Won’t happen.
The elitists will inherently have a different set of rules.


36 posted on 10/16/2009 12:49:30 PM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

So does that mean no more GIANT TV at the football stadium?


37 posted on 10/16/2009 12:49:55 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

That’s fine when you choose it.

That’s not so fine when you force everybody else to choose it.


38 posted on 10/16/2009 12:50:26 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

That’s probably true, but the Japanese, Taiwanese, and Korean companies that make most TVs seem to be dedicated to improving their products in all ways and reducing power consumption even if consumers don’t demand it right now. Power consumption of consumer electronics keeps declining because these Asian companies think years ahead and they know improved energy efficiency is the right thing to do for their companies in the long run. So my conclusion is these regulations are a totally unnecessary response to a nonexistent problem.


39 posted on 10/16/2009 12:50:37 PM PDT by your local physicist (Gridlock is good...in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MrB

There would be dodges, such as buying used units.


40 posted on 10/16/2009 12:51:07 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (ACORN: Absolute Criminal Organization of Reprobate Nuisances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson