Now you've seen it!
Posted on 10/19/2009 3:49:33 AM PDT by Kaslin
A very good friend of mine has lately taken me to task for my opposition to a single payer, universal medical coverage. She argues that she is one of those the president speaks of when describing Americans that do not have “affordable” health insurance. She has a pre-existing condition and coverage is expensive. When I point out that while the cost of her coverage may be high it is certainly affordable (in that she is managing to pay for it) she rejects the argument on the basis that the high cost eats into other equally important expenses. When pressed to define exactly how much an affordable health insurance plan would cost her answer sounds an awful lot like what some folks refer to as free. Like many Americans her ideal is that she should receive the most comprehensive coverage – care for illnesses minor and major -- for little or nothing; health coverage is, after all, a right.
Former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart wrote of hard-core pornography: "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it…” The position that policy and law should not be based on reason, fact and/or moral certainty, but on the infallible conclusions of judges or political leaders was later rejected by Stewart as untenable; no surprise, then, that it has been adopted as a cornerstone of progressive politics.
It is the ambition of the left to establish a whole new set of rights – rights not found in nature or revealed by natures God. Rather they are the product of the anointed and all too ambiguous progressive vision.
In addition to affordable health coverage they passionately claim that all have the right to a decent home, a good education, and a useful job. It all sounds quite noble until one begins to inquire as to the specifics. What is the definition of a decent home? Affordable medical care? A good education? Like Stewart, progressives could never succeed in intelligibly defining the material embraced within such shorthand descriptions, but they no doubt know them when they see them.
Residents of California have an intimate knowledge of the progressive definition of “good schools.” According to the National Center for Education Statistics, California, once the home of the best public elementary and secondary schools in the country, now ranks near the bottom nationally in reading and math proficiency. The good news is that the state ranks first in average teachers salaries. The definition of “good” schools in California apparently means paying teachers to prepare 8th graders not to read and write but to put condoms on a banana with one hand. And, as if to prove the maxim that new liberals have no shame, the leftists in the state assembly continue to ask for ever increasing amounts of taxpayer dollars so that they might further improve the schools. Gay pride day anyone?
I am reminded of conversations I used to have with friends in college. We would sit around dreaming of our future lives and describe the lifestyles we aspired to. Lest we appear too materialistic we all agreed that we didn’t want to be rich; we just wanted to be comfortable. Yes we were naïve but we were earnest. Of course upon fleshing out exactly what each of us meant by “comfortable” we realized our comfortable lifestyles virtually demanded that we either become rich or come within an arms length.
And just like eager, post-adolescent progressive notions of what is affordable, of sufficient quality or decent are completely divorced from the reality of the cost- either in dollars, actual freedoms or both.
In California the cost of “good” schools is a full 30% of the state’s budget and according to the New York Times school children must make do with old textbooks. Open space laws, exotic mortgage instruments and rent control have made housing considerably less affordable and offended private property rights. And the cost of “affordable” (free) healthcare for all will be two trillion dollars in national debt, higher taxes, rationing of services, restrictions and/or taxes on personal freedoms (smoking, cheeseburgers etc.), and a host of other costs never considered by those seeking the comfort of righteousness.
Certainly there is nothing obscene about the desire to educate children, aid the poor or ensure that the sick receive care. But to devise laws and policy based on ambitious, ambiguous and often arbitrary descriptives is, well, downright pornographic.
One of the markers of adulthood is the recognition that there is no ethical way for one person’s need to become another person’s obligation without the second person’s acquiescence.
If You have a Right
To the Service I Provide,
I must be a Slave.
Better...
If You have a Right
To the Service I provide,
I must be Your Slave.
I think you still need one more syllable.
So I advise you put “Joe” as the last word.
So you started to let your hair grow.
Spent big bucks on your wardrobe.
Somehow, ya know there's much more to the trip.
What is hip?
Tell me, tell me, if you think you know.
What is hip?
If you're really hip,
the question, "Will it show?"
You're into a hip trip.
Maybe hipper than hip.
But what is hip?
You became a part of a new breed.
Been smokin' only the best weed.
Hangin' out with the so called "Hippie set."
Seen in all the right places.
Seen with just the right faces.
You should be satisfied, but it ain't quite right.
What is hip?
Tell me tell me if you think you know
What is hip?
Now you've seen it!
Rahm is a braver man than I.
I have insurance, I pay $364 per month, my employer pays the rest and I don’t know how much that is. So far this year I have more than $14,000 out of pocket medical expenses.
I still cannot afford “free” government run insurance.
That out of pocket amount includes some expenses that are unlikely to occur again. (Hearing aids and orthodontia)
You, Sir, are a much "kinder" man than me.
I blame the unions for the out of sight salaries that certain workers receive. Teachers, in the past, were paid a decent salary for 10 months of work. I like to think they still thought about education back then rather than on which tier in their state’s job code they will retire and what percentage of that salary they will receive till they die. Public school teachers, for the most part, have become like any other state employees, driven by entitlement. Like the car industry, the educational system is going to implode because of the unions.
Good luck with that. Why do you call this person friend? If I were to say I have a friend who robs banks or kidnaps and rapes little girls would there be something I could say afer that that would make everything make sense?
In no small way this is "what's wrong in the U.S." We have let people come to ccept things that are unacceptable. We have let out politicians spend our grandchildren's future. We need to start putting some in jail next to Madoff.
"And the cost of “affordable” (free) healthcare for all will be two trillion dollars in national debt, higher taxes, rationing of services, restrictions and/or taxes on personal freedoms (smoking, cheeseburgers etc.), and a host of other costs never considered by those seeking the comfort of righteousness."
She is lucky it is available at all; it's like expecting to get fire insurance after your house burns dow. That's fraud.
What she seeks is not insurance, but welfare.
Why bother even talking to such a dense person?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.