Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

READY TO REVOLT: Oath Keepers pledges to prevent dictatorship in United States
Las Vegas Review-Journal ^ | ALAN MAIMON

Posted on 10/19/2009 5:02:46 AM PDT by RoadTest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: BulletBobCo

I read about the Oath Keepers on FR along with a mention of the 3 percenters. What is a 3 percenter?


21 posted on 10/19/2009 5:36:30 AM PDT by raisincane (Dims think we're all oblivious to the obvious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: raisincane

the percentage of people actively fighting the British for freedom. Not including those that gave them aid or other support. Just the fighting men.


22 posted on 10/19/2009 5:40:19 AM PDT by wiggen (Never in the history of our great country have the people had less representation than they do today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

Somehow I think that if the call was to round up Communists or disarm Muslims then Oath Keepers wouldn’t have a problem with it.


23 posted on 10/19/2009 5:41:06 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident
I have been watching presidential elections since 1972 and have never seen the American population go out and purchase firearms and ammo on this level as a result of an election.

I believe people can sense things, but don't always know what it is they sense, or how to logically explain it. Today, "something" bad is in the air. They can "smell it."

24 posted on 10/19/2009 5:41:09 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

“I’m still trying to determine how much Obama wants some kind of violence as a justification of taking further control.”

Ah — the Reichstag Fire approach.


25 posted on 10/19/2009 5:41:25 AM PDT by ScottinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sport
obama has plans to take full control of the United States. With or without violence. He will do a serious assessment sometime in 2011, probably in the first 6 months, on his chances of re-election in 2012. He will have most if not all of his assets in place to make his move. If he doesn’t like his chances of being re-elected, he will strike then. Should he believe that he has a good chance of beig re-elected, he wil wait. But the bottom line is that he plans on taking control of the United States. It is only a matter of when.

He told you that, did he?

26 posted on 10/19/2009 5:45:14 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

When there is a civil war, Zero can declare anything he wants. 90% of the people he would depend on to enforce it would be his enemies. His declaration of martial law wouldn’t mean zip.


27 posted on 10/19/2009 5:46:17 AM PDT by Quickgun (As a former fetus, I'm opposed to abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

“We’re dealing with evil people here, folks.”

That’s a fact.


28 posted on 10/19/2009 5:47:51 AM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Another obama disciple makes their presence known.


29 posted on 10/19/2009 5:48:37 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: eak3

“When push comes to shove, an armed populace has no chance against on out of control military doing the will of an out of control government.”

I disagree. History is replete with examples of an armed populace doing just that.


30 posted on 10/19/2009 5:49:23 AM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sport
Another obama disciple makes their presence known.

You're the one with the inside information, not me.

31 posted on 10/19/2009 5:49:39 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: eak3

This is the way they are ALWAYS described by the people who have everything to lose...

“They are alarmed at nothing so much, as attempts to awaken the people to jealousy and watchfulness; and it has been an old game played over and over again, to hold up the men who would rouse their fellow citizens and countrymen to a sense of their real danger, and spirit them to the most zealous activity in the use of all proper means for the preservation of the public liberty, as ‘pretended patriots,’ ‘intemperate politicians,’ rash, hotheaded men, Incendiaries, wretched desperadoes, who, as was said of the best of men, would turn the world upside down, or have done it already.” -Adams


32 posted on 10/19/2009 5:50:30 AM PDT by myself6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

I’m not convinced the usurper-in-chief cares about takeover. When destruction of a nation is the agenda, there are less violent means. Hence, I am the resistance.


33 posted on 10/19/2009 5:52:44 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Somehow I think that if the call was to round up Communists or disarm Muslims then Oath Keepers wouldn’t have a problem with it

1) If the Communist was ACTIVELY trying to eliminate the Constitution or the Muslim was trying to implement Sharia Law rather then following the Constitution than by all means YES “round them up”.

2) If the Muslim practiced his religion in peace and was armed to protect himself like the rest of the law abiding society than NO .

3) If the Communist was just expressing his belief,began his own commune with like minded believers, and functioned peacefully and independently than NO.

One can live as a communist in a Free Market society but one cannot live as a capitalist in a communist society.

JMO...


34 posted on 10/19/2009 5:54:12 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

“When backed into a corner, you have to fight.”

The most dangerous creature is one backed into a corner who concludes that he has nothing to lose by fighting.

Remember Winston Churchill’s words:

“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” — Winston Churchill


35 posted on 10/19/2009 5:54:21 AM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
Here, let me fix that one-way sentence for you.

In the age of town halls, talk radio and tea parties, propagandistic newsmedia bordering on mind control, and socialist policies being pushed from the whitehouse, middle ground of opinion is hard to find.


36 posted on 10/19/2009 5:55:16 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayliving

“I fear and pray for my country.”

You and I both.


37 posted on 10/19/2009 5:56:07 AM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

Fear the time when they really DON’T see a need for justification.

At that time, they have surpassed the need for popular support and have passed into the realm of total control.


38 posted on 10/19/2009 5:58:14 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Re: County Sheriffs

I’ve read and heard various conflicting accounts of the Sheriff’s duties and authority.

In some cases, I’ve heard that it is the Sheriff’s responsibility to protect his county’s citizens from the Feds, and to make sure they act within their jurisdiction.

Other sources say that a Sheriff cannot and will not “interfere” with Federal law enforcement.


39 posted on 10/19/2009 6:01:13 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo

bflr


40 posted on 10/19/2009 6:03:24 AM PDT by freebird5850 (O-Bomba is not the Messia. Jesus was a carpenter and could build a cabinet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson