Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Human Methylome: What Do These Patterns Mean? (high state of living cell's design "astonishing")
ICR News ^ | October 22, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 10/22/2009 10:13:30 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

The Human Methylome: What Do These Patterns Mean?

by Brian Thomas, M.S.*

For decades, researchers have noticed that tiny chemicals called “methyl groups” piggyback on DNA molecules, and that they occur in certain patterns. Intrigued by the meaning and function of methylation patterns, especially as they relate to medicine, a five-year, $ 190-million-dollar research effort funded by the National Institutes of Health began in 2008. In one of its studies, researchers have stumbled upon a new intricacy of cell function.

Joseph Ecker of the Salk Institute for Biological Studies led a collaboration to generate the world’s first complete map of human methylation patterns, called the “methylome.” This conveys genetic information beyond the well-known patterns in DNA bases.1

Previous studies showed that DNA methylation helps cells with “gene regulation, DNA-protein interactions, cellular differentiation, suppression of transposable elements, embryogenesis, X-inactivation, genomic imprinting and tumorigenesis.”2 Ecker said in a Salk Institute press release that this new study “will lead to a better understanding of how genome function is regulated in health and disease but also how gene expression is influenced by diet and the environment.”3

Some of the team’s results confirmed what researchers had suspected. For example, in embryonic stem cells, DNA was more densely “methylated”—or covered with methyl groups—than in a differentiated cell. Also, they found less methylation in areas where DNA interacts with proteins. These observations indicate that precise regions of DNA are more thickly covered with methyl groups in order to isolate them from use by the cell. This way, the correct proteins are manufactured at just the right time.

However, they also found unexpected methylation patterns. One type, called “CG Methylation,” was long known to occur. Another category, “non-CG methylation,” was thought to be insignificant, but this study reported that stem cells have “highly expressed genes containing threefold higher non-CG methylation density than non-expressed genes.”3 Thus, biologists now have to sort out yet another cellular mechanism that, like most of the human genome, they understand is important but aren’t quite sure why.4

Those who keep up with cell science often cannot help but be impressed with the high state of design they observe in the cell. For example, after studying DNA transcript regulation, researchers Melissa Moore and Nick Proudfoot recently concluded,

At every point along the way, multifunctional proteins and [ribonucleoprotein] complexes facilitate communication between upstream and downstream steps, providing both feedforward and feedback information essential for proper coordination of what can only be described as an intricate and astonishing web of regulation.5

In like manner, these methylome studies confirm “a highly dynamic, yet tightly controlled, landscape” essential to proper regulation of certain cell processes.3

The living world is full of features small yet robust, and well-regulated yet elegant. It is therefore quite natural to ascribe their origins to a transcendent Creator. It is increasingly difficult in light of ongoing scientific discovery to ignore the fact that “the LORD thy maker…hath stretched forth the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth.”6

References

  1. See Thomas, B. Epigenetics: More Information than Evolution Can Handle. ICR News. Posted on icr.org January 30, 2009, accessed October 16, 2009.
  2. Lister, R. et al. 2009. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. Published online October 14, 2009.
  3. What drives our genes? Salk researchers map the first complete human epigenome. Salk Institute for Biological Studies press release, October 14, 2009.
  4. For example, these authors concluded with the vague notion that these newly discovered non-CG methylation patterns “suggest possible alternative roles for DNA Methylation” (ref. 1).
  5. Moore, M. J. and N. J. Proudfoot. 2009. Pre-mRNA Processing Reaches Bach to Transcription and Ahead to Translation. Cell. 136 (4): 688-700.
  6. Isaiah 51:13.

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Article posted on October 22, 2009.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: cancer; catholic; christian; creation; dna; epigenetics; evangelical; evolution; genetics; genome; healthcare; intelligentdesign; judaism; medicine; nih; protestant; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: GodGunsGuts

” researchers have stumbled upon a new intricacy of cell function.”

Jesus is smarter than they give him credit for.


21 posted on 10/22/2009 11:58:48 AM PDT by RoadTest ( But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
OYG!!!! Something new was discovered in a science field....that means all things previously knnown or thought are now null and void!!!

Back to lyin' Brian Thomas MS* after only one article that was not nonsense?

Those who keep up with cell science often cannot help but be impressed with the high state of design they observe in the cell.

....and you, Brian Thomas MS* are not one of "those"...(typical use of the word "design"...check).

It is therefore quite natural to ascribe their origins to a transcendent Creator.

False conclusion, Brian.

It is increasingly difficult in light of ongoing scientific discovery to ignore the fact that “the LORD thy maker…hath stretched forth the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth.”

Scientifically, there is ZERO difficulty in ignoring what your book says. Stop perverting science to suit your religious needs.

22 posted on 10/22/2009 12:40:17 PM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (Didja know that Man walked with vegetarian T. rex within the last 4,351 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950
Hmmm - OK. I don't believe I said anywhere in my post that I thought the Earth was created in 6 literal days - as a matter of fact, I don't buy the literal 6 day thing. I believe God's concept of time differs radically from ours, and it is quite possible a minute of His time could be the same as a million of ours.

I don't believe one species evolved into another, but I do believe a species can evolve and compensate according to their environment.

Hope that clears that up for ya.

23 posted on 10/22/2009 1:07:56 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Hope....Change...Bullsh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
“It is no valid objection that science as yet throws no light on the far higher problem of the essence or origin of life” (Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species. 6th edition, 1882. p. 421
24 posted on 10/22/2009 1:09:30 PM PDT by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, ThereÂ’s a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
I don't buy the literal 6 day thing.

Then you better prepare for eternal damnation (so say some fR creationists).

I don't believe one species evolved into another, but I do believe a species can evolve and compensate according to their environment.

Can you explain what mechanism stops a particular species from continuing to evolve as the environment continues to change? What if one population is split in two by a catastrophic geologic event, resulting in two drastically different environments -one remains as it was and the other has a near complete change in flora due to volcanic soils. That portion of the population must adapt or die. It does to the point where it can no longer mate with the original population and looks very different due to the different environmental pressures. Do you accept the possibility of such a thing happening?
25 posted on 10/22/2009 2:27:45 PM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke

No I can’t, and I don’t claim to be an expert on the subject. This is just how I feel based upon what I’ve seen and studied in my 47 years on this planet. As I see it, these are the processes put into motion by a creator at some distant point in the past which continue to this day, much of it still not very well understood, and will no doubt be debated until the end of time.

Even though the existance of God cannot be proven scientifically, I am quite confident that not only did God create life and this planet to support it, he is still here and living in spirit. I’ll choose to follow him and trust in his word. If I’m wrong, I’ll guess I’ll find out when I die, right?


26 posted on 10/22/2009 4:38:07 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Hope....Change...Bullsh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
If I’m wrong, I’ll guess I’ll find out when I die, right?

Technically, if you are wrong, then when you die you will just be wormfood, and won't ever find out anything again.

27 posted on 10/22/2009 5:50:32 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Not if he’s wrong, but the Hindus are right. :-)


28 posted on 10/22/2009 5:57:15 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (This tagline excerpted. To read more, click on MyOverratedBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Thanks! The more we learn of what creation is, the more our appreciation for the Creator grows!


29 posted on 10/22/2009 11:17:11 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Thanks! The more we learn of what creation is, the more our appreciation for the Creator grows!


30 posted on 10/22/2009 11:18:38 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson