Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PERSONHOOD MOVEMENT LAUNCHES IN NEVADA
AIPNews.com ^ | October 22, 2009 | Katie Walker

Posted on 10/22/2009 1:46:27 PM PDT by EternalVigilance

American Life League


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
22 October 2009
CONTACT: Katie Walker
540.659.4942| kwalker@all.org 

Washington, DC (22 October 2009)Nevada became the seventh state to launch a “personhood” initiative yesterday.

The amendment reads simply:

“In the great state of Nevada, the term ‘person’ shall apply to every human being.”

“We are thrilled the people of Nevada are finally taking steps to fulfill the dream of the civil rights movement,” said Judie Brown, president of American Life League. “They are working for the fundamental right to human personhood, without which, no other rights exist. For the people of Nevada and the six other states pursuing personhood initiatives, this is about human rights and justice.”

As a citizen-led initiative, approximately 97,000 signatures are needed for the proposed amendment to get on the 2010 statewide ballot. Nevada joins Montana, Michigan, Colorado, California, Florida and Missouri.

Personhood Nevada, the group sponsoring the petition drive, is led by Richard Ziser, a human rights activist who recently led the successful campaign to define marriage in the Nevada Constitution as a union between one man and one woman.

“It’s time for the people of this country and the people of Nevada to demand that all human beings, from their biological beginning, be recognized and protected as persons under the law.”

American Life League was cofounded in 1979 by Judie Brown. It is the largest grassroots Catholic pro-life organization in the United States and is committed to the protection of all innocent human beings from the moment of creation to natural death.  For more information or press inquiries, please contact Katie Walker at 540.659.4942.
 

FOR MORE INFORMATION:
American Life League:
Personhood
http://all.org/personhood/

PersonhoodUSA: Personhood
http://www.personhoodusa.com/

Standard Newswire: Nevada Coalition Introduces Historic Campaign to Affirm All Humans are Persons (22 October 2009)
http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/52834627.html

LifeSiteNews: Nevada Launches Personhood Initiative (22 October 2009)
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/oct/09102202.html

Las Vegas Sun: Initiative Petition PDF
http://media.lasvegassun.com/media/pdfs/blogs/documents/2009/10/21/ziserinitiative.pdf

***


_______________________________
Katie Walker
Director of Communication
American Life League
1179 Courthouse
Road
Stafford, Virginia 22554
540.659.4942
kwalker@all.org
http://www.all.org/


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: moralabsolutes; personhood; prolife

1 posted on 10/22/2009 1:46:27 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; 8mmMauser; Gelato; Taxman; Delphinium; Steve Schulin; MountainFlower; joanie-f

Ping for Personhood!


2 posted on 10/22/2009 1:47:53 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (If they won't "secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity," they won't secure yours either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

This is a joke, right?


3 posted on 10/22/2009 2:38:56 PM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; Coleus

“The amendment reads simply:

“In the great state of Nevada, the term ‘person’ shall apply to every human being.””


I’m a contributor to American Life League and a big fan of Judie Brown. However, I must say that if that amendment is adopted it would still allow judges to define what they believe is a “human being,” and they would not necessarily deem the unborn to belong. If judges can rule that an unborn baby is not a “person,” what makes you believe that they would not deem an unborn baby not to be a “human being”? And what about a Terri Schiavo situation in which the courts have ruled that she doesn’t have rights?

I know that Judie Brown has issues with the use of the words “conception” or “fertilization” as signaling the beginning of human life because some people could argue that “conception” implies implantation in the womb and that “fertilization” would somehow exclude test-tube babies. But having the amendment not state when personhood begins creates an even bigger risk of misinterpretation.

How’s this for the text of a personhood amendment?

“The term “person” as used in this Constitution shall apply to every member of the species Homo Sapiens commencing on the moment in which the spermatozoid fertilizes the ovum and ending on the moment of natural death.”

I believe that this hypothetical amendment would make it impossible for judges to interpret it to mean anything other than what it says.


4 posted on 10/22/2009 3:45:14 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he will protect you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; 185JHP; 230FMJ; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


5 posted on 10/22/2009 4:05:59 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elephant; EternalVigilance; Coleus; narses
This is a joke, right?

Why would this be a joke? Do you believe that unborn children are just "clumps of cells" and therefore have no rights?

6 posted on 10/22/2009 4:07:23 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

The language does seem rather too brief, much more so than in the other states with similar efforts.


7 posted on 10/22/2009 5:28:41 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (If they won't "secure the Blessings of Liberty to Posterity," they won't secure yours either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Pinged from Terri Dailies


8 posted on 10/23/2009 5:02:04 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

bflr


9 posted on 10/23/2009 10:18:17 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson