RE :”Yes, he does have all the cards: he has the BC, he has the passport records, he has the college records, and on and on. It’s time for him to lay down his cards and try some of that transparency he’s been talking about for so long.”
Why would he do that? He has all the cards. This is working for him. It must not be ‘time’ like you say. Is your watch broken?
Why? To prove that he meets the qualifications of the constitution. To prove that he’s not a hypocrite when he claimed that he was going to have the most transparent govt ever. But like I said earlier, I don’t expect him to ever willfully show his BC. Not someone like him. But he should and the country should force him to.
Why won’t you respond to what I said earlier? Is it because you know that your previous statements are illogical?
Here’s what I said:
“Yes, you were arguing that. It’s obvious.
I said “candidate” because we were demanding to see his BC back when he was a candidate!
No one has ever said that a birth certificate is a requirement in the constitution. They would not have put that in there weren’t too many people at the time who had one. Today, every person running for president would have one and since it is the best evidence for birth and since the requirement in the constitution is that you must be natural born, the birth certificate must be seen. This is especially important in Obama’s case because his place of birth is absolutely crucial to his natural born status.
We’re simply asking to see his BC and justifiably so. The burden of proof is on Obama. He has the BC. So what exactly are we supposed to prove?
You can’t criticize us for not having proof when so much of the evidence is being hid by Obama! It’s like a cop trying to figure out the identity of a suspect, so the suspect tells the cop that his name is Bill Smith, and the cop asks for a driver’s license for proof that his name is actually Bill Smith, but the guy refuses to give him his license and instead tells the cop that the cop has no proof that his name isn’t Bill Smith! And instead of just showing the cop his license he just goes on and on about being falsely accused and how the cop has no proof that he’s lying. Your logic just doesn’t make any damn sense!
Let me ask you this: Should Obama have even showed us his certification of live birth? The words “certification of live birth” isn’t in the constitution either. Using your flawed argument, he shouldn’t even have had to show a COLB, right?”