My post have been correct and are acceptable to the evolutionary community to the extent that other scientist would have difficulty placing a label on me. The facts are what they are and the ones I site enjoy agreement in the scientific community. On the other hand your post have been inconsistent and one could identify you as a strong advocate of ID and/or someone that is totally confused about the theory of evolution but none the less wishes to support it.
They have been absolutely incorrect about PE being somehow an explanation or consequence of the likelihood of mutation of particular sequences, and many other things.
Cite as in citation, not site.
You do not understand that no theory is ever ‘proven’.
Anyone who thinks my posts support the Incompetent Design idiocy put forth by the Discovery Insistute would have to be delusional.
You lack the credibility to make any such assessment; as your lack of understanding of the basics of science, evolution, and punctuated equilibrium is obvious for all to see.