The part that scientifically disproves all of the alternate evo-nonsense.
Creationists don’t pretend to know exactly how God did it.
But it’s quite easy to scientifically evaluate evolutionist theories and cite the gaps and conclusions that are a bridge too far.
Your response still contains no example of scientific achievement. Criticism is easy - that seems to be what you are pointing to. But scientific evaluation it isn’t.
Then why are they so darned quick to say how He DIDN'T do it?