Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats: Elections Not a Referendum on Obama
U. S. News ^ | November 3, 2009 | Kenneth T. Walsh

Posted on 11/03/2009 12:31:50 PM PST by An Old Man

The Democrats seem to be positioning themselves for two and maybe three big losses in today's off-year elections. Late polls suggest that the Republicans could sweep the gubernatorial races in New Jersey and Virginia and the special congressional election in upstate New York. So Democratic strategists have been downplaying the idea that today's results will be a referendum on President Obama or his policies.

This morning, Brad Woodhouse, communications director for the Democratic National Committee, sent an E-mail to reporters questioning whether the elections should be nationalized by the media. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters, "I don't think that these elections will portend a lot."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ny23
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
I love it when a plan comes together!
1 posted on 11/03/2009 12:31:50 PM PST by An Old Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Translation: their internal polling data looks very bad.


2 posted on 11/03/2009 12:33:20 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Democratic strategists would have been saying the exact opposite had the dems swept these elections.


3 posted on 11/03/2009 12:33:54 PM PST by Wee-Weed Up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

“Translation: their internal polling data looks very bad”

So true. Now if they were winning such as New Jersey they would be saying the results just confirm the country is behind Obama.


4 posted on 11/03/2009 12:34:35 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I believe it is Joe Biden who we are voting against, not that nice negro fellow.


5 posted on 11/03/2009 12:35:06 PM PST by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Normal pol spin.

However, I think Nobel-boy really will believe the spin.
Ego being what it is.


6 posted on 11/03/2009 12:35:37 PM PST by Gunflint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wee-Weed Up

Yeah, it would be a “mandate” for their Commie agenda.


7 posted on 11/03/2009 12:35:48 PM PST by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

I love the spin. These elections don’t reflect on Obama, even though they were run on NATIONAL issues, by and large....except for perhaps New Jersey. Hoffman ran against Obama, against healthcare, against cap and trade, and McDonnell did the same. McDonnell tied Deeds to Obama at every turn. While Deeds was campaigning with Obama and sending out flyers with Obama’s picture on it, McDonnell was busy hammering Deeds’ support of ObamaCare and Obama’s cap and trade, and Obama’s card check bill. Yeah, sure they have NOTHING to do with Obama. Right. Keep telling yourselves that.

The spin to watch tonight and tomorrow will be quite humorous. I’ve even heard media types and pundits say that Hoffman winning is actually GOOD for Democrats. LOL! They love to claim that independents and moderates are being pushed out of the party, when all the polling suggests the exact opposite. Independents have left Obama and Democrats in DROVES. McDonnell is winning independents by 20 to 30 pts.

The spin is absurd and laughable. Can’t wait for the Fox election desk tonight with Barone and Hume.


8 posted on 11/03/2009 12:36:08 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters, "I don't think that these elections will portend a lot."

Geez, who would have thought that I'd agree with the liar-in-chief? Likely for different reasons, though.

2010 is a political lifetime away. Who knows what will happen?

However, I think that (R) wins are generally a good thing, and that this indicates the Dem landslide that started in 2006, has stopped. But it doesn't mean that the war is over, just this one particular chapter of it.

9 posted on 11/03/2009 12:37:13 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Rush, you magnificent b@$Tard.


10 posted on 11/03/2009 12:37:51 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

The real message to these Democrats in denial is this: 2010 is right around the corner and YOUR NEXT!


11 posted on 11/03/2009 12:38:04 PM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Of course not. Must protect the socialist man-child, Dear Leader. Nothing is his fault, but anything good - yup, that’s because of him.


12 posted on 11/03/2009 12:38:47 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

“Democrats: Elections Not a Referendum on Obama”
-and bears use the restroom.


13 posted on 11/03/2009 12:39:12 PM PST by dainbramaged (If you want a friend, get a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters, “I don't think that these elections will portend a lot.”

Just like the 1993 elections.

I wonder what tune Gibbs whistles while walking past the graveyard?

14 posted on 11/03/2009 12:39:57 PM PST by MAexile (Bats left, votes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Wonder if he thinks ‘portend’ means ‘feel very good’.


15 posted on 11/03/2009 12:40:19 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

The fruits of rushing the leftist agenda is coming back to haunt Obama and his trolls. This is the first of a long line of rejections to the Obama doctrine of socialist agenda which started back in the late sixties and included the likes of the Manson family.


16 posted on 11/03/2009 12:40:28 PM PST by MCCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cranked
The real message to these Democrats in denial is this: 2010 is right around the corner and YOUR NEXT!

Make that ALL politicians...you're next!! Throw the bums OUT!

17 posted on 11/03/2009 12:40:53 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Unless, of course, the Democrats win. Then it is a referendum.


18 posted on 11/03/2009 12:42:13 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cranked
Note to democrats:

2010 is right around the corner and YOUR NEXT!

That's a fact.

19 posted on 11/03/2009 12:42:35 PM PST by An Old Man (Use it up, Wear it out, Make it do, or Do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man
Elections Not a Referendum on Obama

No, but it is a referendum on how well their election corruption machine is coming along. Consider it a trial run for 2010.

20 posted on 11/03/2009 12:42:58 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson