Posted on 11/03/2009 9:16:12 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Rush answers that almost every day it seems.
0 (as in 0bama not 0'Reilly) dogmatically asserts that the foundation of this country is immoral and that wealth must be transferred from those who have to those who don't for social justice reasons including punishment.
Rush cites 0's close connections to Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright as evidence among other things.
So that's why.
Notice, I haven't seen Obama or the Dem's criticize Rush for this statement. They don't want that idea spread, even in the attempt to refute it.
Am I wrong?
I like Bill O'Reilly. He does great work and has a great show. In my book, he's really an old-fashioned kind of crusading liberal editor that Hollywood used to make movies about (see Jessica's Law).
I don't know if it's a generational thing or due to his background in the MSM, but O'Reilly has two (at least) real big holes in his knowledge. First, he's clueless about economics and how a free market economy operates (see his conspiracy theory about speculators driving oil prices up and down). Also, check out Ann Coulter teaching O'Reilly about economics.
Second, he's clueless to that other 'eco' work, ecology. He's bought environmentalism hook, line and sinker.
Ignore him on these two issues and enjoy the rest of his program.
Thw political backlash of a bad economy is nothing a good World War can't fix. Just ask FDR.
“If you destroy the economy, you can still get re-elected by using a compliant media to put the blame on someone else (such as George Bush or Wall Street), and then promise the voters relief from the misery that you caused.”
That’s exactly right! That’s also WHY he’s in such a big hurry to ruin the economy completely by pushing through health care, cap and trade, ect. He has to get this stuff done quickly so he can blame it on Bush and it will stick with the (stupid!) sheeple.
BOR makes me sick, Glen Beck needs to be in his time slot.
Thank you Chuckles, That was on the dot.
O’Reilly is a guy who measures success by how many books and doormats his show sells.
O’Reilly has tried this before and failed.
He used to have a radio show, like the rest, it is now dust like err amerika.
O’Reilly is just another tabloid tv hack. He was current affair and he still is current affair. BOR is all smoke and mirrors.
The sooner FNC replaces him with Beck, the better.
The BOR can go somewhere else with Shep Smith.
Anyone who has to ask this question, let alone agree with it, knows nothing about economic history and politics in this country. I'll give you a clue...
FDR
Obama does not even bother with him.
Obama’s WH only goes after Beck and Rush.
BOR is irrelivant.
BOR is insignificant.
BOR add NOTHING to the public conversation.
BOR taking on Limbaugh as a moderate. That is funny.
He wishes. BOR = blowhard loser.
BOR does not read enough to even get his facts straight half the time. How is he going to promote anything when he has no understanding of constitutional freedom and Marxism? Today he is a marxist. Tomorrow he is for freedom. The Marxist in him will kill the American in him right on tee vee.
Whoever wrote this is so stupid he thinks O’Reilly is a conservative? And that defending Obama will make him more popular than Limbaugh? This guy’s been drinking wood alcohol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.