Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California to withhold a bigger chunk of paychecks By Shane Goldmacher and W.J. Hennigan
L A Times ^ | November 5, 2009 | By Shane Goldmacher and W.J. Hennigan

Posted on 11/05/2009 11:19:03 AM PST by franky8

Reporting from Los Angeles and Sacramento - Starting Sunday, cash-strapped California will dig deeper into the pocketbooks of wage earners -- holding back 10% more than it already does in state income taxes just as the biggest shopping season of the year kicks into gear.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca; california; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
The amount goes up 10% on Sunday as Sacramento borrows from taxpayers. Technically, it's not an income tax increase: You'll get the money back eventually.
1 posted on 11/05/2009 11:19:05 AM PST by franky8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: franky8

Just increase the number of dependents you claim for withholding. 20 is a nice round number....


2 posted on 11/05/2009 11:20:55 AM PST by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky8

>> You’ll get the money back eventually.

In IOUs?


3 posted on 11/05/2009 11:21:39 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

>> Just increase the number of dependents you claim for withholding. 20 is a nice round number....

That seems the obvious solution. But does anyone know if CA uses the same W-4 you fill out for the Feds, or two separate W-4 forms?

If it’s the same form for state and fed, you could screw up your federal withholding while “fixing” state.


4 posted on 11/05/2009 11:25:28 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: franky8

Time to go back to a cash only economy.


5 posted on 11/05/2009 11:26:50 AM PST by wilco200 (11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to TAKE away everything you have.

Someday soon the people will wake up and REVOLT against this [THEFT] confiscation of property and wages.

Don't count on getting it back if the status quo public policy remains in Sacramento.

6 posted on 11/05/2009 11:26:56 AM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Even if CA uses the same W-4 as the Feds, I think it would be wise to claim a lot of dependants and then make an estimated quarterly payment to the feds.

But don’t let California have your money. You’ll only get IOUs back.


7 posted on 11/05/2009 11:30:42 AM PST by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
It's a different form.

Here's a link to California's version of the W-4 called the DE 4. http://www.edd.ca.gov/pdf_pub_ctr/de4.pdf

Bump up the number of withholding allowances to reduce the state's take so you don't get a refund, which the state might delay paying or refuse to pay next year.

8 posted on 11/05/2009 11:31:58 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Any similarity between V and the Obama admin is just that of Obama and any other totalitarian regime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kidd

>> Even if CA uses the same W-4 as the Feds, I think it would be wise to claim a lot of dependants and then make an estimated quarterly payment to the feds.

That’s a good solution. Don’t forget to follow through on it though. ;-)


9 posted on 11/05/2009 11:33:36 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: franky8

They’re forcing California taxpayers to loan them much needed cash for three or four months. Maybe longer.


10 posted on 11/05/2009 11:37:53 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

>> It’s a different form.

Well there you go! My guess is, a large number of these babies are being filled out, even as we speak.


11 posted on 11/05/2009 11:56:31 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: franky8

What is the income tax rate, with the added 10 %?


12 posted on 11/05/2009 12:11:02 PM PST by redreno (Americans don't go Gault. Americans go Postal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky8
You'll get the money back eventually.

Of course we will....

13 posted on 11/05/2009 12:12:52 PM PST by Churchillspirit (9/11/01...NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky8

bump


14 posted on 11/05/2009 12:17:40 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky8

Man, just damn. You know “Ahnold” and company will deplay and/or refuse refunds. Sheeeez.....


15 posted on 11/05/2009 12:23:11 PM PST by PAMadMax (Islam is a disease....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky8
My take is they'll default and issue IOUs for the refunds.
16 posted on 11/05/2009 12:25:19 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Bump up your dependants and at the end of the year write them an IOU in crayon...


17 posted on 11/05/2009 1:18:06 PM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: franky8

This reminds me of one of the Directives in Atlas Shrugged. Let California sink! We will rebuild it on the ashes of stupidity.


18 posted on 11/05/2009 1:41:48 PM PST by ChinaThreat (3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

They are taxing income that is already greatly decreased. Why not just go into bank accounts and tax wealth. It is all sleezy, but large accounts could probably handle loaning out money easier than the average taxpayer, and it is just a loan until the stimulus really kicks in, right? Nancy Pelosi would not mind helping out, along with the wealthy Hollywood left, and the liberal tech CEO’s. Pony Up!


19 posted on 11/06/2009 2:29:33 PM PST by All Blue State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: franky8

Fellow Citizens PLEASE wake up!!!!! There is a huge tax increase coming in 2009 and that is why they are increasing the amount deducted from taxpayers checks now ... because many people will owe the state when they file their 2009 tax return.
What the jerks in Sacramento are hiding from you is that they have DECREASED the dependent exemption from $309 in 2008 to $98 in 2009. What that means is you will lose $211 for each child you are able to claim as a dependent which will directly increase the amount of tax you OWE! In addition, California State Income Tax has been increased by .25% and the brackets are changing but I haven’t seen those yet.
Please look this up at Franchise Tax Board’s website. Taxes ARE going up big time ... thanks to the guys we have in Sacramento who don’t know how to stop spending. Can we please just vote these jerks OUT!!!! PLEASE!!!!


20 posted on 11/07/2009 3:33:42 AM PST by spirit_free (How many Congressional Democrats belong to the Socialist Party of America ..... lots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson