Skip to comments.
Jayson Blair: Offering His Views On Making Up News (Dinosaur Media DeathWatchâ„¢)
NPR ^
| November 6, 2009
| David Folkenflik
Posted on 11/06/2009 4:56:16 AM PST by abb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Of interest to our group.
1
posted on
11/06/2009 4:56:18 AM PST
by
abb
To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; backhoe; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...
2
posted on
11/06/2009 4:57:00 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
...it's a wonder he hasn't opened up a government sponsored school yet.....
3
posted on
11/06/2009 4:57:54 AM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: abb
Blair says he soon became convinced the only way to have a true impact was to reach The New York Times. He played a key role in destroying his Idol.
4
posted on
11/06/2009 5:09:17 AM PST
by
iowamark
(certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
To: iowamark
Blair says he soon became convinced the only way to have a true impact was to reach The New York Times. He played a key role in destroying his Idol.
Then he did have a true impact. LOL
5
posted on
11/06/2009 5:13:21 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
To: abb
The Journalism paradigm has shifted from “Who, what, where, when,” to “Fake but accurate”.
Of course, “accurate” is a euphemism for “politically correct”.
6
posted on
11/06/2009 5:17:41 AM PST
by
Westbrook
(Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: abb
7
posted on
11/06/2009 5:28:27 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
During our conversation, Blair seems sincere, compelling, and even contrite. But how much stock can you put in what's said by someone best known for lying? Like Democrats?
IMO, Blair was ambitious and desired attention and admiration, much like many others. Yet, he was too lazy to do the real leg work necessary for the job and the facts often weren't sexy enough for a good story so he would wing it. The more successful he was the easier it became. Fiction became fact.
All the other excuses of alcohol, drugs, bipolar disorder etc., are just further attempts not to own up to that so the lie continues.
8
posted on
11/06/2009 5:48:54 AM PST
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
To: abb
Given his record, I had to ask Pinch why faculty members, journalists and students assembled for a conference on media ethics should believe what he had to say.
The New York Nymph gave a half-laugh and said they should listen, not ask questions and never form their own opinions.
"It's up to us to make up all the news that's fit to print," he said.
9
posted on
11/06/2009 5:54:47 AM PST
by
Zakeet
(Central Park Zoo vs. White House -- one has an African Lion -- other has a lyin' African)
To: abb
Wow, this is almost as weird as having Spitzer give a speech about ethics ... oh, wait.
To: abb
Jayson Blair, the former New York Times reporter who triggered the greatest scandal in the newspaper's history. Anyone who thinks that Blair's silly fabrications are a greater scandal than Walter Duranty's Pulitzer-winning coverup of the Holodomor is a fool.
11
posted on
11/06/2009 6:06:27 AM PST
by
Sloth
(For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of the International Olympic Committee.)
To: abb
In line with Robert Toricelli being a Corzine campaign adviser.
12
posted on
11/06/2009 6:09:43 AM PST
by
Carley
(OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
To: abb
“Getting Jayson Blair obviously was a departure,”
The departure was ackowledging that Blair was fabricating news, which the NYT has mastered.
13
posted on
11/06/2009 6:12:02 AM PST
by
Spok
To: abb
On Friday, the twice-yearly Washington and Lee Journalism Ethics Institute will hear from its latest keynote speaker: Jayson Blair, the former New York Times reporter who triggered the greatest scandal in the newspaper's history. Something to ponder: would the Washington And Lee Journalism Ethics Institute ever ask Rush Limbaugh to speak?
14
posted on
11/06/2009 6:20:10 AM PST
by
Tribune7
(I am Joe Wilson!)
To: Zakeet
15
posted on
11/06/2009 6:36:39 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
16
posted on
11/06/2009 6:42:37 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
"'Getting Jayson Blair obviously was a departure,' says Edward Wasserman, the Knight professor of journalism ethics at Washington and Lee...Wasserman says the Times culture was dysfunctional, but that Blair cannot avoid his own responsibility." LOL!!
I suspect they don't know it, quite yet; but, they really are finished. Kaput.
17
posted on
11/06/2009 6:49:17 AM PST
by
Landru
(Forget the pebble Grasshopper, just leave.)
To: abb
18
posted on
11/06/2009 6:52:46 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
"But the vast majority of users will not notice anything, said Steven Brill." Steven Brill?
Same shill behind the (now defunct) Brill's Content rag, spawned of the ignoble Clintigula era??
LOL
>click<
19
posted on
11/06/2009 7:11:01 AM PST
by
Landru
(Forget the pebble Grasshopper, just leave.)
To: Landru
20
posted on
11/06/2009 7:12:00 AM PST
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson