Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PARANOID POLITICS
Psychology Today ^ | 11/6/09 | Ken Eisold, PhD

Posted on 11/06/2009 7:02:18 AM PST by steve-b

If we hadn't gotten inured to the relentless outpouring of "crazy" ideas from the extreme right, we would be forced to wonder what is going on - and what it means.

By "crazy" I mean the birthers or those who see a fascist (or communist) take-over of the Federal Reserve Bank, or attempts to indoctrinate school children. In America, we have always had conspiracy theories and exaggerated suspicions of political or economic plots. Richard Hofstadter wrote "The Paranoid Style in American Politics" 45 years ago, but he was referring largely to fringe groups. Now, however, these paranoid ideas are mainstream, retailed on Fox news and plastered over the internet, as Thomas Frank pointed out last week on The New York Times website (See "From John Birchers to Birthers.")

Hofstadter was careful to point out that he used the term "paranoid" descriptively, as an analogy, not as an actual diagnosis. But I think the pathological implications of the diagnosis are relevant. Paranoia starts with virulent hatred towards others, who are seen to be thoroughly deserving of contempt. The intensity of the hatred spills over, and the blurred object is seen as hating and attacking in return. Hatred entirely fills the space. That's what makes it seem so out of touch with reality, so crazy.

It seems clear to me that those who spew invective and baseless accusations display the classic outlines of paranoia. They are suffused with hate, and they feel persecuted. But that is not all there is to this new proliferation of paranoia. Something is changing in our culture, something that makes these pathological processes acceptable, even normal.

Today, intensity and conviction have acquired their own legitimacy. In the dark 30's of the last century, as Europe was strangling in the grip of fascism, William Butler Yeats wrote "The Second Coming," his apocalyptic vision of the end of civilization, ending with these powerful lines:

The best lack all conviction While the worst are full of passionate intensity.
But now, after several more catastrophes have afflicted us, unimaginable to Yeats, passionate intensity has become a kind of defense, a source of stability, a means of survival. We are forced to respect it, admire it even, as an antidote to the helplessness that threatens us face to face with our world. Certainly, that makes it harder to see that it is, also, a form of madness.

This is all the more true as traditional authorities have been so thoroughly compromised. Politicians sell their services for campaign donations, regulators routinely approve questionable practices, priests abuse their trust, insurers scheme to deny coverage, brokers sell their clients dubious investments, and so on and on.

In this climate, truth itself has become questionable. If it hasn't been sold to the highest bidder, it is simply more and more difficult to find - or to believe in.

So, if we can't have truth, at least we can have conviction.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: paranoia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: steve-b

So....this explains Bush Derangement Syndrome. I knew there was an answer to it.


21 posted on 11/06/2009 8:04:25 AM PST by Timocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DGHoodini

One of the historical policies of collectivists, monarchists, and tyrants in general

is to classify the opposition to their rule (or ideology) as insanity in order to justify disposing of those who oppose them.


22 posted on 11/06/2009 8:06:10 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
"By "crazy" I mean the birthers or those who see ... attempts to indoctrinate school children."

That's been going on by the left for decades. Or shall we dig out all the "Dear Leader" videos of singing schoolchildren ?

23 posted on 11/06/2009 6:16:22 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
By "crazy" I mean the birthers or those who see a fascist (or communist) take-over of the Federal Reserve Bank, or attempts to indoctrinate school children.

Psychology today?
Physician, heal thyself.

I stopped reading right there.

If the present government meets all the qualities that define Fascism, taking over the management of private companies, if not fascism, what is it?

If school children are forced to sing the praises of the great leader, like some despotic African thugocracy, if it not child abuse and indoctrination, what is it? If it is not the politics of the personality cult, what positive behavior does that fall under?

Clearly, as the Texas maggot so clearly demonstrated yesterday, psychology does nor normally attract the mentally healthiest of individuals, typically.

So this is what we can expect from them? oxymoronic psychobabble?

24 posted on 11/06/2009 6:38:17 PM PST by Publius6961 (Â…he's not America, he's an employee who hasn't risen to minimal expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson