Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terrorism at Fort Hood: More Attacks to Come
Family Security Matters ^ | 11-6-09 | Deborah Schurman-Kauflin, Ph.D.

Posted on 11/06/2009 8:45:58 AM PST by serialcrimes

Interesting article about the shootings and the dangers of infiltrators. Article points out police stations are high risk for these attacks.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: crushislam; forthood; forthoodkiller; islam; nidalmalikhasan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 11/06/2009 8:45:59 AM PST by serialcrimes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: serialcrimes
Article points out police stations are high risk for these attacks.

Very true. Obviously, these are big, strong men who don't simply attack foes unable to fight back... oh, wait... nevermind... Police stations are probably pretty safe.

2 posted on 11/06/2009 8:49:21 AM PST by pgyanke (You have no "rights" that require an involuntary burden on another person. Period. - MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

11,000 Mulsims on the Armed Forces. Let’s say half are jihadists. If each has a goal of killing at least 12 soldiers, that’s 66000 soldiers, or 22 times the number of people killed on 9-11.


3 posted on 11/06/2009 8:51:15 AM PST by rintense (You do not advance conservatism by becoming more liberal. ~ rintense, 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

I’m guessing a police station attack would be carried out by a suicide bomber.


4 posted on 11/06/2009 8:53:53 AM PST by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: serialcrimes

Yesterday afternoon, we kept hearing about a second shooter at another location, and that he was “on the loose”. AP was reporting there were “dual shootings”, that the second location was a theater.

Today...nothing. Not a word about a second shooter or location. What’s going on here???


5 posted on 11/06/2009 8:56:46 AM PST by Deo volente (This administration is a national emergency!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente

Good question. Expect NO ANSWERS!

Where TF is FOX?


6 posted on 11/06/2009 8:59:34 AM PST by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: serialcrimes
"Is it possible that the Fort Hood shooter was not working with a large terror group? Of course. One does not have to be a member of a large organization to be a terrorist. If the actions further the cause of the terror group and the actions are meant to further the cause, those who carry out those attacks are terrorists. To dismiss this attack as the act of one crazy gunman would be perilous. Small cells have plotted to hit U.S. Military targets with increasing numbers. And there are more waiting in the wings. Look for police stations to be hit in the future."
7 posted on 11/06/2009 9:00:17 AM PST by Marie (remember, remember, the fifth of november...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente

I still don’t see how one man with two handguns can fire more than 50 rounds at a group of trained people without somebody beating the crap out of him while he reloads.


8 posted on 11/06/2009 9:02:56 AM PST by Marie (remember, remember, the fifth of november...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Your comments are not appreciated by this law enforcement family. Go to hell.


9 posted on 11/06/2009 9:08:14 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Your comments are not appreciated by this law enforcement family. Go to hell.


10 posted on 11/06/2009 9:08:26 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Sorry, I may have misunderstood your comment. What are you saying or is my brain mush?


11 posted on 11/06/2009 9:11:28 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Sorry, I may have misunderstood your comment. What are you saying or is my brain mush?


12 posted on 11/06/2009 9:11:36 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cathy

Cathy, you misunderstand me. I am also from a deep legacy law enforcement family.

My point, apparently poorly-enough stated to upset you, is that the jihadists are cowards. They will only attack those unable to defend themselves. That is why the article’s author is wrong about police stations being on the list of next possible targets... the police are very capable of defending themselves and too much for the enemy.

They can’t face our military head-on when they are on their guard so the jihadists take advantage of our hospitality and civility to kill us in our sleep.

I hope I have explained it better. God bless you.


13 posted on 11/06/2009 9:14:03 AM PST by pgyanke (You have no "rights" that require an involuntary burden on another person. Period. - MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Marie
Exactly. Say he has a 45 in each hand. He has to put one pistol down, remove the mag., reach into his pocket, pull out another mag., insert it into the pistol and load a round into the chamber. Now everyone around him is military. During those 10 seconds or so, should we assume no one would rush him?? BULL! We have service people in battle who, in a few seconds, jump on hand grenades, without thinking.
14 posted on 11/06/2009 9:16:52 AM PST by ditto h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: serialcrimes

Muslims in the military should be considered a security risk.


15 posted on 11/06/2009 9:16:57 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ditto h

Military folks would have the training not to “freeze” like most of us civies would do when faced with an active shooter.


16 posted on 11/06/2009 9:18:25 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Marie

Reloading a semi-automatic pistol is so quick that if you look away for a second you might not even realize that he just reloaded. This video will show you how quick it can be.

http://hsoiblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/on-reloads/


17 posted on 11/06/2009 9:19:17 AM PST by ansel12 (Scozzafava/Romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Marie

With a little practice you can reload a semi auto in less that two seconds. How far can you run from a dead stop in two seconds?


18 posted on 11/06/2009 9:20:43 AM PST by Drill Thrawl (0-435 Vote them all out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Marie

When your in combat you might have a chance, reloading pistols only takes three to five seconds if you have proper training, but when your there in line small talking about whatever and all of a sudden shots from no where it isn’t that easy.


19 posted on 11/06/2009 9:27:37 AM PST by Eyes Unclouded ("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente

Honestly I don’t know if we will ever get the entire truth here. There will be too much white washing and every attempt to paint this as a lone lunatic rather than something more. It was more.


20 posted on 11/06/2009 9:35:13 AM PST by serialcrimes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson