Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

Re #34

Defense attorneys defend the accused, guilty or not. This is a Constitutional right.

Please refrain from showing your ignorance in the future.


37 posted on 11/09/2009 4:58:48 PM PST by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Artemis Webb

Hasan gave a lecture saying Islamic law trumps the Constitution.


39 posted on 11/09/2009 5:00:34 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb
Ugh. I’d rather clean a port-a-potty with my tongue than represent that SOB.

Nobody put a gun to this attorneys head to force him to represent this guy....Obviously, this attorney is a bottom feeder, looking for notoriety and a few bucks.

Defense attorneys defend the accused, guilty or not. This is a Constitutional right. Please refrain from showing your ignorance in the future.

I didn't suggest or imply what an attorneys tasks may or may not be...I only said this attorney had a choice as to represent or not represent this guy, which is accurate.

Please read my posts slowly in the future, to avoid appearing an ignorant fool.

41 posted on 11/09/2009 5:05:01 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

Re #34 has his right to an opinion without your characterizing it as ignorant.

Re #34 did not question the accused’ right to counsel as you seem to imply.

I agree with Re #34 that this COL Galligan is a bottom feeder. Read his CV if you get around to it.

I hope Nidal Hasan fries to a crisp for what he “alledgedly” did. Just my opinion.

;^)


44 posted on 11/09/2009 5:14:13 PM PST by elcid1970 ("O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson