Re #34
Defense attorneys defend the accused, guilty or not. This is a Constitutional right.
Please refrain from showing your ignorance in the future.
Hasan gave a lecture saying Islamic law trumps the Constitution.
Nobody put a gun to this attorneys head to force him to represent this guy....Obviously, this attorney is a bottom feeder, looking for notoriety and a few bucks.
Defense attorneys defend the accused, guilty or not. This is a Constitutional right. Please refrain from showing your ignorance in the future.
I didn't suggest or imply what an attorneys tasks may or may not be...I only said this attorney had a choice as to represent or not represent this guy, which is accurate.
Please read my posts slowly in the future, to avoid appearing an ignorant fool.
Re #34 has his right to an opinion without your characterizing it as ignorant.
Re #34 did not question the accused’ right to counsel as you seem to imply.
I agree with Re #34 that this COL Galligan is a bottom feeder. Read his CV if you get around to it.
I hope Nidal Hasan fries to a crisp for what he “alledgedly” did. Just my opinion.
;^)