Then the article goes on to quote all the ‘evolutionists’ that DO acknowledge that natural selection requires pre-existing life. So what is the got-ya?? Where's the evos that say that natural selection works on non-life (the dead) as this title says? Another imaginary straw man to beat up?
‘I think it is disingenuous to argue that the origin of life is irrelevant to evolution’
—evolutionist Gordy Slack, The Scientist, June 2008.
When dealing with people who need to lie to find an argument, its probably best to laugh at them and walk away.
The first living cell got selected from where?
Somehow it assembled/got assembled from something and because of it’s suitability for survival, survived to reproduce.
But evos constantly dodge the question of where the first one came from.