Posted on 11/19/2009 10:21:38 PM PST by Marie
This email may be referring to Michael Mann. He's the guy who invented the "Hocky Stick" Graph.
From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann@xxxxx.xxx, mhughes@xxxx.xxx
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxx.xx.xx,t.osborn@xxxx.xxx
Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or first thing tomorrow.
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998. Thanks for the comments, Ray.
Cheers
Phil
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxxx.xxx
NR4 7TJ
UK
------------------------------
Here's the article about the arguable research he has done...
Top independent, peer-reviewed research indicating that climate change is real, deadly, and caused by humans Posted by Cory Doctorow, February 4, 2009 12:44 AM | permalink
From Nature's excellent Climate Change section, excellent summation of the year's research into anthropogenic climate change -- that is, the hard scientific evidence from unbiased, independent scientists indicating that climate change is real, caused by humans, and dangerous to the planet.
"4. The hockey stick holds up
A follow-up to the infamous 1998 'hockey stick' curve confirmed that the past two decades are the warmest in recent history. Climatologist Michael Mann's contentious graph has become a symbol of the fierce debates on evidence for global warming, to the extent that an independent investigation into the study was performed at the request of US Congressman Joe Barton. The 2006 report that resulted from the Barton enquiry criticized Mann and colleagues for their reliance on tree-ring data from bristlecone pines as a proxy to reconstruct Northern Hemisphere temperatures over the past 1,000 years. Although their earlier work had been largely vindicated, in September the same team revised their global surface temperature estimates for the past 2,000 years, using a greatly expanded set of proxies, including marine sediments, ice cores, coral and historical documents (Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13252–13257; 2008). The team reconstructed global temperatures with and without inclusion of the tree-ring records: without their inclusion, the data showed that recent warming is greater than at any point in at least the past 1,300 years; inclusion of tree-ring data extended this period to at least 1,700 years. According to the Christian Science Monitor: "It still looks a lot like the much-battered, but still rink-ready stick of 1998. Today the handle reaches further back and it's a bit more gnarly. But the blade at the business end tells the same story."
Here is another;
“Okay, here’s one (possible/probable) criminal part:”(Deleting e-mails which have been requested thru FOIA)
From: Phil Jones
To: “Michael E. Mann”
Subject: IPCC & FOI
Date: Thu May 29 11:04:11 2008
Mike,
Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.
Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t
have his new email address.
We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.
I see that CA claim they discovered the 1945 problem in the Nature paper!!
Cheers
Phil
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) 1603 592090
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) 1603 507784
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@uea.ac.uk
NR4 7TJ
UK
Anyone want to get Phil Jones on the phone?
“the question has already been settled!”
What would Al Gore say...
Watch for a rebound in the markets? Checking Honk Kong now?
tags should include: dump carbon credits 1st thing in the morning and told ya so and crank up the heater its cold in here!
From SoylentGreen;
http://cbullitt.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/scrubbed-cru-data-hacked-recovered-and-released/
canwe hang them by thier shrunken testicles until they either fall off or die now???
by mrfixit November 19, 2009 at 8:06 pm
#
Wow. That’s pretty huge alright.
by Nicole November 19, 2009 at 8:07 pm
#
Look at comment 136 over at CA!
It states that the Mann code (!!!!) is in there. And the Yamal coding. I just checked – its there. Steve Mc must be on his knees now thanking every god ever conceived for being so kind to him!
Now we will find out the scope of Mann’s disingenuity on his Hockey Stick horseshit.
This is beyond belief….
Oh – and LC – I LOVED that pogo comment!
by Steamboat McGoo November 19, 2009 at 8:08 pm
#
mrfixit,
They have no testicles….
by LC Aggie Sith November 19, 2009 at 8:08 pm
#
So … do we get to have a mini-ice age now? I’d rather like to break out my cross-country skis … and ram them up their biblical cornholes.
by Snarky Basterd November 19, 2009 at 8:14 pm
#
I can’t wait to see this on the front page of the New York Times….
Bwaahaaahaaa….. just kidding….
by Sully November 19, 2009 at 8:16 pm
“Deep Cool” – the Mole within Hadley CRU « Watts Up With That?
“As some WUWT readers may have learned from reading Climate Audit, an anonymous source deep within Hadley CRU has provided Steve McIntyre a copy of a data file he has been seeking but has had his FOI requests to Hadley seeking the same file, rebuked.”
I’ve seen the data. As I posted last night on Climate Audit:
You know, not everyone in every organization believes in everything the organization does. This is why we have leaks in the White House and people like “Deep Throat” that provide evidential tidbits with guidance like “follow the money”.
Steve has shared this data and the source with me, as a way of verification, and I can vouch for both the validity of the data and of the source ip address. It truly comes from deep within the organization. – Anthony
While the CRU data file is not the most current, it is the most current one the mole could produce for us.
But most importantly this will not deter Steve in his FOI requests, he writes:
And by the way, just because I’ve got a version of the data doesn’t mean that I’m going to give up trying to get the data through FOI. Quite the opposite.
Indeed. Better to get it through the front door.
I mentioned to Steve this morning via email that in addition to verifying the source, I was able to come up with a photo of the “anonymous” mole in CRU. I’ve sent him a copy.
Stay tuned.
h/t to commenter John S. at Climate Audit for the “Deep Cool” moniker.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/07/26/deep-cool-the-mole-within-hadley-cru/
26 07 2009
Any luck? Actually I would think that by now someone would have uploaded the files to one or more of the free filesharing websites that people use to share their own (non-copyrighted, of course) data.
isn’t this a nail into the skull of cap and trade?
ping
Yes
No, because the people behind Federal regulation of carbon know it's all a fraud, already.
File size tells you nothing. But go to the wattsupwiththat thread to see the hashes and checksums for the file which you can use after you download, but before you open it.
NB, I’ve spent all morning watching this new GRU/Hadley hack story swarm over the Web, almost exclusively via knowledgable Climate skeptics sites & the Examiner web paper...just now found Andrew Bolt @ the Herald Sun, AU has picked up this and is running with it. Lubos Motl, terrific Cz Physicist & strong IT guy has been all over the IT side, http://motls.blogspot.com/
The Brit in charge @ Hadley has admitted to the hack story!!! This is the Pentagon Papers of AGW!
Marie, any mention of al gore?
Any mention of the carbon trading outfit - Chicago Climate Exchange - set up by king obuma?
Tie that in with obuma and these papers and you have a clear impeachable offense.
O'rly? The thot plickens...
This could get interesting.
bttt
OK, think about all the global warming BS. The emissions standards that kill your gas mileage. The destructive Cap and Trade bill they’re trying to shoved sown our throats. The pressure to recycle. The pressure on farmers. The Clean Air Act has abused to force companies to change the way they produce things in order to avoid global warming. The war on coal (think about the “clean coal” conversation Biden had with that greeny-weeny during the campaign). etc, etc.
This file proves that the GW controversy is PURE BS. It contains the emails and other damning evidence from the top GW scientists themselves. In their own words, they discuss falsifying information, lying to congress and destroying evidence. From what I found last night, these are *the* guys who were the most influential in the IPCC report that congress leans on to shove all this onto the American people.
This puts the LIE to everything in our school text books. This is the greatest scam ever perpetuated on the entire people of the world.
And this file is the proof of that.
The first thing I opened was a brochure called “Rules of the Game”. It reads like Rules for Radicals. It's all about how to get the public on board. Very manipulative.
I just downloaded it with no issues. My virus protection only asked if I was sure because of the type of file.
good catch
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.