Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: 20-somethings can go 2 years between Paps
AP ^ | 11/20/09 | LAURAN NEERGAARD

Posted on 11/19/2009 11:43:46 PM PST by Rastus

WASHINGTON – Most women in their 20s can have a Pap smear every two years instead of annually, say new guidelines that conclude that's enough to catch slow-growing cervical cancer.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deathpanels; healthcare; obama; obamacare; palinwasright; rationing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Here we go again! I'd say these people are tone deaf, but the truth is they don't care what we think.

Sorry if it's been posted. It would seem it would have to have been, but a couple of searches didn't find it.

1 posted on 11/19/2009 11:43:46 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Can we say ... “MEDICAL RATIONING!!”??? ALREADY..

Hey ladies, between the Mammograms and the Pap Smears.. line up, take one for the FUHRER and DROP DEAD!!!

geez... GOD HELP US ALL.


2 posted on 11/19/2009 11:48:15 PM PST by gwilhelm56 (Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

Laura Ingraham was on O’Reilly talking about slowing down on prostate checks. I don’t know if she was speculating that that was the next step, or if it’s already been recommended by one of these death panels.


3 posted on 11/19/2009 11:49:57 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

allready recomended...


4 posted on 11/19/2009 11:51:23 PM PST by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

How about we go 2 years of Obama instead of 4. He’s worse than cancer.


5 posted on 11/19/2009 11:52:40 PM PST by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: historyrepeatz

Or perhaps I should’ve said, “F-U and stay the hell out of our private parts.”


6 posted on 11/19/2009 11:54:22 PM PST by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Hey look! A 50% reduction in costs for 0bamacare pap smears! Schweet!!

What’s the worst that could happen? You die? That’s even more cost savings passed onto 0bamacare


7 posted on 11/19/2009 11:54:39 PM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: historyrepeatz; gwilhelm56

See: gwilhelm56’s tagline. :-)


8 posted on 11/19/2009 11:56:20 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

This type of biopsy is very cheap when considering what it can prevent in the long run.


9 posted on 11/19/2009 11:59:21 PM PST by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

This isn’t new. More than a few Drs. recommend this, particularly for patients who aren’t at high risk for HPV.


10 posted on 11/20/2009 12:01:30 AM PST by TruJess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56
Best CYA for 0bamacare as provided by this AP article : "The timing of the Pap guidelines is coincidence". Yeah, right.
11 posted on 11/20/2009 12:07:57 AM PST by Nasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

When I was a freshman in high school, my health teacher had a smoking hot senior class TA who would sit at a desk at the front of the class, facing the rest of us. On Fridays, she would show up in her cheerleading uniform and I don’t think any of the guys in the class heard of word of the lecture on those days.

Anyway, about a year later, I heard that she developed cervical cancer. 18, and she had to have her uterus removed. I didn’t hear anything beyond that, and I don’t know if it was caught with a pap or if she found out the hard way, but these guidelines certainly wouldn’t have helped her at all.


12 posted on 11/20/2009 12:18:05 AM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus
No Pap + abstinence not encouraged = more dead women

The sitting president is a Muslim misogynist.

13 posted on 11/20/2009 12:30:19 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Where are these morons coming from? I can't understand the people who are believing this bs. Pap smears save lives, I know all too well. This makes no sense when you read about all the STD’s that cause cancer & the fact they push sex in schools etc. FUBO & leave our health care alone.
14 posted on 11/20/2009 12:49:41 AM PST by pandoraou812 (Don't play leapfrog with a unicorn.....................^........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Both mamograms and prostate screening (PSA) tests are to be postponed.

Survival of the fittest? I wonder.


15 posted on 11/20/2009 1:18:12 AM PST by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tinamina
Well, since Mrs. GBC is over 50 she will continue to get the ***** press, but if she ever tires of self examination, I'm more than willing to ...
16 posted on 11/20/2009 1:27:40 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Breaking news: New guidelines stress that having your baby in the comfort of your own kitchen protects the baby from the airborne germs that abound in the typical hospital setting.


17 posted on 11/20/2009 1:47:59 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus; All

Mams, prostates, cervixes... hey, you never needed those parts, anyway... think of how much money you'll save DeathCare!

18 posted on 11/20/2009 1:53:43 AM PST by backhoe (All Across America, the Lights are being relit again...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Dirt is cheaper than cancer treatments.


19 posted on 11/20/2009 2:01:59 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Why don’t we just abandon all diagnostic tests all together.
It will save us a fortune in Health care. /s


20 posted on 11/20/2009 2:05:22 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson