|
Just in time for Copenhagen too.
Huh?
What does this mean?
More details please.
Multiple previous threads posted on this; try a search.
|
To: ray bradley ,mann@xxxxx.xxx, mhughes@xxxx.xxx
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxx.xx.xx,t.osborn@xxxx.xxx
Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tims got a diagram here well send that either later today or first thing tomorrow.
Ive just completed Mikes Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keiths to hide the decline.
Mikes series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N.
The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.
Cheers
Phil
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxxx.xxx
NR4 7TJ
UK
(no link)
HOW COLD DOES IT FEEL? - NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE USES NEW FORMULA FOR WIND CHILL FACTOR
Evansville Courier, The (IN) - Friday, November 2, 2001
Author: RANDOLPH E. SCHMID, Associated Press writer
It may not seem quite so cold this winter.
The National Weather Service introduced a new wind chill index Thursday that eases some of the extreme coldness estimates of the old formula.
The wind chill index is a formula that estimates how cold it feels based on the combination of temperature and wind . It is widely reported in winter to help people decide how warmly to dress.
Under the new formula, a 10 mph wind makes a reading of 30 degrees Fahrenheit feel like 21 degrees and a reading of 15 degrees feel like 3 degrees. The old formula calculated that with a 10 mph wind 30 degrees felt like 16 and 15 degrees felt like minus 3.
A 20 mph wind under the new formula makes a 30 degree reading feel like 17 and 15 degrees fell like minus 2. The old formula showed a 20 mph wind making 30 degrees feel like 4 and 15 feel like minus 17.
(snip)
Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked [epic fraud?]
So far, it appears to be genuine, but I advise jumping to conclusions until more info comes in.
If true, it's nucular...
If what this following email means what I think it means, then the wheels have just come off the Global Warming movement!
****
From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann@xxxxx.xxx, mhughes@xxxx.xxx
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxx.xx.xx,t.osborn@xxxx.xxx
Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tims got a diagram here well send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow.
Ive just completed Mikes Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
1961 for Keiths to hide the decline. Mikes series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.
Cheers
Phil
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone +44 (0) xxxxx
School of Environmental Sciences Fax +44 (0) xxxx
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.jones@xxxx.xxx
NR4 7TJ
UK
This news is just breaking. We’ll need to let it settle, and become debate. It should cause the release of the hounds.
IMO there has never been any doubt that AGW was bullscoot, but now there is the possibility of exposing precisely the brazen bullscoot it really is.
Ultimately I’d like to see some opportunistic Socialist con-artists swaying in the breeze, hanging from lamp standards by their necks.
Anxiously I await that debate.
Hey did anyone hear about the hacking of the bogus global warming site?
Yeah, but we have too many people working on Levi, er, Ricky Hollywood to really look into it.
bookmark
Wow!
If true, KA-BOOM!
:D
BFLR & BTTT !!!