Click the picture:
Nice to see more of the main stream media pick this up.
This might turn out to be fun.
And everyone who has known all along AGW was a fraud have collectively said duh! Hard to believe that those that bought the fraud consider themselves smart and oh so much more savvy than those cretinous, knuckldragging deniers....LOL!
"Academics who have purposely hidden data, destroyed information and doctored their results have committed scientific fraud.
These revelations of fudged science should have a cooling effect on global-warming hysteria and the panicked policies that are being pushed forward to address the unproven theory"
Ballgame.
” Here’s what you won’t see on tv, folks:
“More than 31,000 scientists have signed a petition denying that man is responsible for global warming.”
Whatever they believe, don’t you think the tv NEWS media should give us BOTH sides? “
That’s the best article I have seen so far on the e-mails. They nailed it.
I am still waiting for the rest of the media to pick this up. When is Beck going to expose it?
Academics who have purposely hidden data, destroyed information and doctored their results have committed scientific fraud.
...these revelations of fudged science should have a cooling effect on global-warming hysteria and the panicked policies that are being pushed forward to address the unproven theory.
The AGW folks do not and will not see that they have done anything wrong. “Anything” that they do to save mother earth from the evil, polluting capitalists is completely OK in their book.
Their only regret: getting caught.
I believe there should be charges of high crimes against humanity leveled against them.
That file demonstrates that the previous programmer and the rest of the people involved with the data collection had zero clue how to work with large data sets (assuming the raw data itself wasn't fudged). The programmer comments repeatedly about how the data is undocumented to the point of not even being able to determine what a good potion of it even is or where it was from, if it was raw sensor data or if it was somehow modified, and about undocumented code functions that modify bits and pieces of the data in odd ways that don't make any sense.
Even if these guys were conducting themselves in an ethical manner, their results would have to be tossed on their merits for a total lack of control of the data they were working with!
Here are some examples:
8. Had a hunt and found an identically-named temperature database file which did include normals lines at the start of every station. How handy - naming two different files with exactly the same name and relying on their location to differentiate! Aaarrgghh!! Re-ran anomdtb:
So.. we don't have the coefficients files (just .eps plots of something). But what are all those monthly files? DON'T KNOW, UNDOCUMENTED. Wherever I look, there are data files, no info about what they are other than their names. And that's useless.. take the above example, the filenames in the _mon and _ann directories are identical, but the contents are not. And the only difference is that one directory is apparently 'monthly' and the other 'annual' - yet both contain monthly files.
..knowing how long it takes to debug this suite - the experiment endeth here. The option (like all the anomdtb options) is totally undocumented so we'll never know what we lost.
22. Right, time to stop pussyfooting around the niceties of Tim's labyrinthine software suites - let's have a go at producing CRU TS 3.0! since failing to do that will be the definitive failure of the entire project..
You can't imagine what this has cost me - to actually allow the operator to assign false WMO codes!! But what else is there in such situations? Especially when dealing with a 'Master' database of dubious provenance (which, er, they all are and always will be).
Emphasis mine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydo2Mwnwpac&feature=player_embedded
Climate Change Bombshell: Dr. Tim Ball on the hacked CRU emails
To the Global Warming Hoaxters, Joe Wilson “ YOU LIE ! “
So, dare one ask where this 160 megabytes of information may be downloaded? Obviously not from NYT, but since “hackers” obtained the information perhaps NYT is not the primary/sole source of the information.
All it would take is a URL. Anyone with ideas/information on this subject?
bump for later
Click the picture:
Scientific progress depends on accurate and complete data. It also relies on replication. The past couple of days have uncovered some shocking revelations about the baloney practices that pass as sound science about climate change.
Ummmm..., those revelations were made in the video documentary about "Anthropogenic Global Warming" below... :-)
It’s one thing to gripe and complain about these things and disagree with it, but it’s quite another to convince your friends and neighbors and relatives and coworkers...
THEREFORE..., it’s also absolutely necessary for people to know the information in the following documentary. If there were simply one video that you could see and/or show people you know... this would be the one...
The following is an excellent video documentary on the so-called “Global Warming” I would recommend it to all FReepers. It’s a very well-made documentary.
“The Great Global Warming Swindle”
If you want to download it, via a BitTorrent site (using a BitTorrent client), you can get it at the following link. Information about BitTorrent protocol and BitTorrent clients and their comparison at these three links (in this sentence). Some additional BitTorrent information here and here.
Download it here...
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3635222/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle
[This is a high-quality copy, of about a gigabyte in size. This link is the information about it, and you have to click the download link to get it on your BitTorrent client software. You'll also find users' comments here, too.]
It’s worth seeing and having for relatives, friends, neighbors and coworkers to see.
Also, see it online here...
http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/great_global_warming_swindle.php
[this one is considerably lower quality, is a flash video and viewable online, of course..., and also, you can download flash video on a website either yourself or some software doing it.]
Buy it on DVD here...
[this would be the very highest quality version, on a DVD disk, of several gigabytes in size...] At Amazon, it seems to be high-priced now and have only a few copies right now.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000WLUXZE
At WAGtv (a UK shop), but don't know about shipping. The price is reasonable, though.
https://www.wagtv.com/product/The-Great-Global-Warming-Swindle-322.html
[And..., some information from WAGtv about this item.]
Also, in split parts on YouTube...
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 1 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TqqWJugXzs
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 2 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5rGpDMN8lw
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 3 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzFL6Ixe_bo
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 4 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNQy2rT_dvU
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 5 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dzIMXGI6k8
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 6 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GjOgQN1Jco
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 7 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHI2GfbfrYw
The Great Global Warming Swindle (Part 8 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7N9benJh3Lw
The Great Global Warming Swindle - Credits (Part 9 of 9)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_1ifP-ri58
Ah, but the Global Warming Guys were ahead of this! About a year ago, they changed the name of their scam to “Climate Change”
That way, their “loathsome spotty behinds”* are covered no matter WHAT happens to the planet!
*Monty Python hat tip!
It feels good to be proved right!
Where is the resident FR global warming apologist cogitator?
I think he needs to get a spanking.
