Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs; sometime lurker; GonzoII
You go a long way toward proving my points.

"The bill of rights does not apply to businesses, only to individuals. Like forcing those cigarette warning labels are not prohibited."

Point A, pregnancy aid centers are not engaged in commerce. They provide a free service, with no exchange of money.

Point B, the can be regulated to stop force or fraud, as I said before. But they dont't engage in force or fraud.

Point C, cigarette warning labels? You're serious? You're going to defend government-mandated cigarette warning labels? How about fat-content warning labels for Pasta Alfredo? Percentage of fiber in your favorite snack-crackers? Mandatory warnings on the backs of refrigerators that say "Don't try to carry this on your back down a flight of stairs"?

In a conservative forum, it's so rare to hear this kind of approving reference to the unfortunate proliferation of nanny-state regulations that I'm rather taken aback.

"Try telling your female employee you like her rear end and see how much the Bill of Rights protects you. Try telling your customer you dont like his race or sex"

Now I'm completely floored. All of these ought to be personal liberty social-decorum "free speech" issues. Demeaning race or sex talk disgusts me, but I don't think the jackasses involved ought to be prosecuted or litigated. If you talk this way and it's getting in the way of your work, I support the right of your boss to fire you.

Yes, some of us do defend all that conservative-liberty stuff including the right to annoying free speech. It's as good a reason as any to hang around Free Republic.

17 posted on 11/24/2009 12:50:52 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("The first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious. " George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o; sometime lurker; GonzoII
RE :”... pregnancy aid centers are not engaged in commerce . They provide a free service, with no exchange of money.” (response to “The bill of rights does not apply to businesses, only to individuals”)

Are you kidding? Do they have employees? Are they Incorporated? If someone slips on ice on the property, who gets sued? The individual?

Are you making the argument a nonprofit business is an individual under the constitution?

When they make YOU wear a sign I will be the first to defend your rights as an individual.

18 posted on 11/24/2009 1:06:59 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

“In a conservative forum, it’s so rare to hear this kind of approving reference to the unfortunate proliferation of nanny-state regulations that I’m rather taken aback.”

Oh come now.

Surely you’ve run across the car-insurance and car-safety (seat belts, child seats) discussions occasionally.

Not rare at all.


27 posted on 11/24/2009 7:41:05 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson