Posted on 11/27/2009 6:28:50 PM PST by Steelfish
Did Barack Obama Lie About His Birth To Become President?
DAVID JONES, 27th November 2009.
As a highly regarded young detective, Neil Sankey was once seconded to elite Scotland Yard units hunting down IRA bombers, dangerous anarchists and organised crime barons.
Today, however, almost 30 years after quitting Hampshire constabulary to become a private investigator in California, he is wrestling with an inquiry that is as controversial as it is complex; one that makes that his former police work seem mundane by comparison.
Now aged 64, and semi-retired, Mr Sankey is attempting to prove that Barack Obama is guilty of the most audacious act of fraud in U.S political history, having become President when he was not even eligible to run for office.
The infant Obama with his mother, Ann Dunham, who met his father at university He is conducting his inquiries on behalf of a protest group known as the 'Birthers' - so-called because they claim Obama lied about his birth place to satisfy the requirements of the U.S constitution, which stipulates that the President must be a 'natural born' American citizen.
According to his biography, Obama was born 48 years ago in Hawaii, the 50th state of the union. But the Birthers are convinced that he came into the world in Kenya..
'As an investigator it has become obvious to me that something very strange is going on,' he intoned gravely when we spoke this week. 'His background throws up all kinds of anomalies. It may sound incredible (but) this guy comes from nowhere. No one really knows who he is.'
To most Americans, of course, the very idea that anyone could cheat their way into the world's most powerful post by rewriting their personal history sounds preposterous.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
We’ll never know for sure, so the question will keep coming up. Barry can lay it all to rest by showing the actual birth certificate. The fact that he keeps hiding it and evading the issue only adds fuel to the fire.
We’ll never know for sure, so the question will keep coming up. Barry can lay it all to rest by showing the actual birth certificate. The fact that he keeps hiding it and evading the issue only adds fuel to the fire.
The difference between Obama and his dog, Bo?
That’s easy.
Bo has papers.
Sankey should just start a website that solicits donations for the Kapiolani Childrens Hospital in Hawaii (supposed birth hospital of OBOZO) The donation will only be made in the name of the Doctor that witnessed the birth and signed the Long version Birth certificate. The web site would generate millions of dollars in donation money putting the Obama administration in the awkward place of either denying the poor children at Kapiolani a much needed medical ward upgrade or releasing his Long version birth cert. I don’t see how he could survive under the pressure that this would put on him.
and look bottom line if he is legit then we get the proof and some sick kids get some hospital upgrades but imagine if he cannot prove a witness to his live Birth? Especially since he is already on record as having been born at the hospital it would be hard to see a BC with a midwifes signature or some lame excuses being made to cover for him.
Dan Rather would sell the last of his journalistic soul to promote some sort of Bush National Guard conspiracy/scandal, but obama and his lack of records? Just not a problem. Politics above and before everything seems to be the controlling legal authority.
1 Certified copy of original birth certificate
2 Columbia University transcripts
3 Columbia thesis paper
4 Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5 Harvard University transcripts
6 Illinois State Senate records
7 Illinois State Senate schedule
8 Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9 Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mother
10 Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11 Occidental College Transcripts
12 Parent’s marriage Certificate
13 Record of baptism
14 Selective Service registration records
15 Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16 Passport records for all passports
17 Scholarly articles
18 SAT and LSAT test scores
19 Access to his grandmother in Kenya
20 List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
21 Punahou grade school records
22 Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education.
23 Page 11 of Stanley Ann Dunham's divorce decree.
Anyone who cares about their country would be very concerned that a POTUS had hidden every scrap of information of his life that he possibly could.
Michelle 0bama's hidden records.
1. MO's law practice records.
2. Illinois State bar records stating the reason Michelle 0bama was disbarred.
I would find it hard to believe that he has never told the truth...
(But I know, that's not the question asked.)
BFLR (You-Tube watching)
You're falling down on the job here.
Then why hasn't one? It's not like these stories came out last week, this has been going on for a year now. Why hasn't one of those astute and reasonably well connected detective types gotten any answers yet?
The only answer I can think of is that if there was something to be found then someone would have found it by now. What's your explanation?
At the time of the drafting and ratification of the United States constitution,
the definition of natural born citizen, combined both the principles of jus soli and jus sanguinis.
“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
Emmerich De Vattel, (1714-1767,) Law of Nations, 1758, § 212, "Of the citizens and naturals."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.