Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats in revolt over Barack Obama’s troop surge
London Times ^ | 11/29/2009 | Marie Colvin

Posted on 11/29/2009 7:29:04 AM PST by Saije

Barack Obama's much-vaunted eloquence faces the biggest test of his presidential career this week when he takes to the stage at West Point military academy to explain to a nation that thought it had elected an anti-war president why he is escalating the conflict in Afghanistan.

After almost three months of agonising, nine war councils and endless leaks, the president will finally make his views known on Tuesday when he is expected to announce that he is sending about 30,000 more troops. This will push up American forces to 100,000 and the total number of allied forces to almost 140,000, as many troops as the Soviet Union had in Afghanistan.

The carefully chosen backdrop cannot disguise Obama’s dilemma. Somehow he has to convince his own public that the United States has an exit strategy and will not become bogged down, as it did in Vietnam, while making clear to the Taliban and Pakistan that it has not lost its resolve and will stay as long as it takes.

Obama’s toughest challenge will be to win over his most loyal political supporters. He is facing a growing revolt in the Democratic party over why the US needs to be in Afghanistan at all when the real threat — Al-Qaeda — is in Pakistan, and over the spiralling cost in both lives and dollars.

“I think the operative question is why we’re there,” said Anna Eshoo, a Democratic congresswoman who sits on the House intelligence committee. “That’s what I’ll be wanting to hear from the president.”***

The annual bill for the extra troops is estimated at $30 billion (£18.2 billion), on top of the $10 billion-a-month the war is costing. “We’re still not out of Iraq and we’re getting deeper into Afghanistan, both of which are hugely expensive,” she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; democrats; obama; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Eric in the Ozarks

“Barry defiles the ground at West Point....”

....you ain’t kidding!...this effete little sissy shouldn’t be allowed to breath the same air as those cadets.


21 posted on 11/29/2009 8:03:12 AM PST by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
Image Hosting by imagefra.me

Image Hosting by imagefra.me

WHY?

22 posted on 11/29/2009 8:06:24 AM PST by pke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Saije

Now he’s having to use forced audiences.


23 posted on 11/29/2009 8:10:00 AM PST by A Strict Constructionist (How long before we are forced to refresh the Tree of Liberty? Sic semper tryannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian

It is not at all self-evident that an open-ended commitment to war in Afghanistan is the only possible conservative position.

War is politics carried on by other means. So what exactly is our political goal in Afghanistan, and how will we know when it has been achieved?

We quite literally cannot invade, occupy and rule the entire Muslim world. We have the ability to kill all Muslims, but not to control them.

Sometimes it seems we are fighting in Afghanistan because we feel we should be fighting radical Islam somewhere, and Afghanistan is as good as anywhere. This does not seem a completely convincing reason to me.


24 posted on 11/29/2009 8:18:42 AM PST by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Saije
This really jumped out at me:

Obama’s toughest challenge will be to win over his most loyal political supporters.

So, um... that would mean that they aren't loyal if one decision can turn them into opponents.
25 posted on 11/29/2009 8:25:32 AM PST by Renderofveils (My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music. - Nabokov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

The MSM are the stupid monkeys. Hear no evil of Obama, speak no evil of Obama, see no evil of Obama.


26 posted on 11/29/2009 8:26:11 AM PST by ODDITHER (HAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
It is not at all self-evident that an open-ended commitment to war in Afghanistan is the only possible conservative position.

War is politics carried on by other means. So what exactly is our political goal in Afghanistan, and how will we know when it has been achieved?

We quite literally cannot invade, occupy and rule the entire Muslim world. We have the ability to kill all Muslims, but not to control them.

Sometimes it seems we are fighting in Afghanistan because we feel we should be fighting radical Islam somewhere, and Afghanistan is as good as anywhere. This does not seem a completely convincing reason to me.

The solution is as simple as it was in ending the threat of Imperial Japan...

1. Demand unconditional surrender.

2. Mecca = Hiroshima...

3.Demand unconditional surrender.

4. Medina = Nagasaki...

5. Continue until there is peace...

27 posted on 11/29/2009 8:27:26 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Saije
when he is expected to announce that he is sending about 30,000 more troops.

The number keeps dropping. By the time it's officially announced, it might be down to half of what General Petreus asked for, many moons ago. I suspect if he were to ask today, he'd ask for even more, given the delay. Day late a division short, that's our boy Barry.

28 posted on 11/29/2009 8:30:15 AM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saije

Even his own party realizes he’s just Wagging the Dog. He’s not going to loosen the leash w/the ROEs.

Pray for America and Our Troops


29 posted on 11/29/2009 8:33:20 AM PST by bray (Palin can see the White House from her Porch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
"This does not seem a completely convincing reason to me."

I'll give you the real reason we're still there and must remain there until complete victory is achieved, no matter how long it takes or how much it costs.

We where attacked on September 11, 2001 by elements of Al Qaeda, a terrorist organization based in Afghanistan. They are still there (and in other places). The Taliban, who aided them, are still there (and in other places). Until such time as these enemies are completely and utterly defeated, we must stay and fight. This should be beyond politics and all other considerations are secondary.

The only "exit strategy" is complete victory, even if that means going through the mouth of hell. Maybe it's easy for me to say it, since I'm sitting in my easy chair and risking nothing, but I'm a veteran and have to right to say it.

Are you convinced yet?

30 posted on 11/29/2009 8:40:23 AM PST by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Saije

Over-statement, lack of insight, and wishful thinking on part of the Times. Sorry, there is no revolt among Dems; there are simply some murmurs, which will die down after he gives the speech.


31 posted on 11/29/2009 8:41:53 AM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pke

Thanks for posting the pic of the AA plane being loaded. I had it before but lost it. Do you have any background info on it?


32 posted on 11/29/2009 8:42:46 AM PST by nralife (Sarah doesn't know it's a damn show! She thinks it's a damn fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gimme1ibertee
What would be really appropriate would be for the host, in this case probably the Commandant of West Point, to deviate from the script, just a little.

Before I introduce Mr. Obama, I would like to announce that members of the Judge Advocate Corps of all the services have determined that Mr. Obama is not a natural born citizen, by virtue of his father not being a citizen. They have reported that this makes him not eligible to the Office of President, in light of Article II Section 1 clause 5 of the Constitution."

"With that, I introduce to you Mr. Obama".

33 posted on 11/29/2009 8:43:34 AM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Saije

I pray the loader of the teleprompter makes a typo and puts in “300,000” instead of “30,000”. Boy wouldn’t that make the peaceniks heads explode!


34 posted on 11/29/2009 8:45:02 AM PST by Terry Mross (I voted for McCain and STILL wasted my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saije
This lost me early. REAL early.

Barack Obama's much-vaunted eloquence...

vaunted –adjective
praised boastfully or excessively

OK, they got that right. Moving on...

eloquence –noun
the practice or art of using language with fluency and aptness.

THAT'S where I get stuck: trying to recall any incidents of Barack Obama's "eloquence".

35 posted on 11/29/2009 8:46:44 AM PST by AF_Blue ("Are you guys ready? Let's roll!" - Todd Beamer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saije
“There is serious unrest in our caucus ... can we afford this war?” said Nancy Pelosi, the House speaker.

Wow! I know it's hard to believe, but Nancy finally found something we can't afford! Too bad she doesn't apply the same test of "affordability" to socialized medical care, socialized energy production, and all of the rest of the Obamunist socialization programs.

36 posted on 11/29/2009 8:50:58 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from The Right Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saije
Anna Eshoo, a Democratic congresswoman who sits on the House intelligence committee

I'm sorry, I can't get past thinking of someone saying "Gesundheit" during the roll call...

37 posted on 11/29/2009 8:51:43 AM PST by mikrofon (House Intelligence??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saije

That little thing known as reality is a real bitch for these types


38 posted on 11/29/2009 8:52:10 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I'd like to advise that a bit.

"With that, I introduce to give you Mr. Obama".

Sergeant Major!..."

:).

39 posted on 11/29/2009 8:52:58 AM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
Al Quaeda is a true multi-national operation. It appears they are at present much more active in Pakistan than in Afghanistan, but of course we haven't (and won't) invade Pakistan.

It has a non-trivial military, complete with nukes. We really don't want to go there.

So we'll keep fighting in Afghanistan, with no end in sight.

The only "exit strategy" is complete victory

Excellent thought. How would you define "complete victory" in Aghanistan or against al Quaeda?

40 posted on 11/29/2009 8:56:58 AM PST by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson