That makes a lot of sense. I never thought of that angle, but you’re right. It could explain just about everything.
No clue as to Charles Johnsons’ sexuality-wouldn’t recognize him if he walked right up to me-but years ago, even when he was primarily a WOT site, his posts struck me as very “queeny”. I refer especially to the angry, fly off the handle posts he would make whenever someone dared criticize the layout or the “look” of his blog. Very emotional, very touchy, very ‘take-everything-as-a-personal-attack-y’ posts, to the point that I would consider normal in a middle aged woman, but was odd in a young(ish) man.Just very ‘queeny’, not just in the sense of (drama) queeny, but in the sense that his posts seemed very female or effeminate. Again, this doesn’t necessarily make him gay, but it DOES make him an a#&^%*e, IMO.