Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rove Fires Back at Lauer Charge That Bush Admin. 'Took Its Eye Off the Ball' in Afghanistan
Newsbusters.org ^ | 12-1-09 | Geoffrey Dickens

Posted on 12/01/2009 9:34:18 AM PST by Justaham

Previewing the President's speech tonight, NBC's Matt Lauer invited on Karl Rove, on Tuesday's Today show, and pressed the former White House senior adviser if the reason Afghanistan still required the U.S.'s attention is because the previous administration "took its eye off the ball in Afghanistan," and "concentrated too heavily on Iraq." Rove hit back, accusing Lauer and Bush administration critics of "revisionism." And later, when Lauer questioned if there were enough "resources" to counter the Taliban resurgence in Afghanistan Rove fired back that any one in the Obama administration was in no position to criticize:

"Well look, first of all, they, resources were sent as they were needed, but I would remind you this, President Obama is in no position whatsoever to criticize what President Bush did. Because in 2007, President Obama, then a member of the United States Senate, voted against war funding for Iraq and Afghanistan. If this was so vital, then why did he not speak out? He was chairman of a committee overseeing NATO. He could have easily called a hearing to say, ‘I'm concerned about this issue.' He did not."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; cheney; dickcheney; vpcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2009 9:34:18 AM PST by Justaham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Justaham

What little actual history known about bammy is none too good. Tell me again how this clymer was elected??


2 posted on 12/01/2009 9:38:11 AM PST by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

He was chairman of a committee overseeing NATO.

so he had access to top secret info in 2007 and likely before then as well?

now he has the nukular football.

riddle me this Batman.


3 posted on 12/01/2009 9:38:36 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. May yur bandwidth exceed your girth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
And the dude who bombed the Twin Tower in 1993...He fled to where??

Going to Iraq is called "wisdom"...blocking the back door at a critical time.

People don't realize how close Saddam was to getting out from the UN CONDITIONAL treaty.

Anyone who thinks that Saddam and Usama wouldn't work together is DUMB

4 posted on 12/01/2009 9:38:55 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Matt Lauer is a sissy!! Rove put him in his place.


5 posted on 12/01/2009 9:39:45 AM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
YA GOTTA LOVE KARL!!!!!!!!!!!!! I would have loved to see lauer's jaw drop when Karl recited Obama's history as a senator to voted AGAINST funding the war in Afganistan and Iraq.

Karl........you are JUST THE BEST and you ALWAYS have been. President Bush pulled in the most intelligent, moral and rascally (:^) ( in a good way ) folks EVER to advise him and work with him...between you and his VP pick...just WOW right there!!!!!

6 posted on 12/01/2009 9:40:00 AM PST by Republic (Get the uhbama's, reid's, pelosi's dirty greedy fingers out of our personal medical care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw

John McCain


7 posted on 12/01/2009 9:40:31 AM PST by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Thats right, Lauer you punk, blow right over the part about Obama not bothering to utter a peep (let alone attend any related meetings) about Afghanistan while in a position to do so in congress as if it wasn’t said.


8 posted on 12/01/2009 9:41:39 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

What a douche bag Lauer is.


9 posted on 12/01/2009 9:43:20 AM PST by linn37 ( "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmileo

He sure did! I bet he left a mark.


10 posted on 12/01/2009 9:48:37 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
The "Bush took his eye off the ball" line is a purposeful diversion; a false accusation promoted by the Left in order to accomplish three simultaneous objectives. It allows Liberals to (a) criticize Republicans for their conduct of the war, (b) make it seem as though Democrats would have done it better, while (c) effectively disguising the fact that these Democrats detest the very idea of American military power and want no part of it in either Iraq or Afghanistan.

Obama and the Democrats repeated this line countless times during the 2008 campaign and to significant effect, but of course McCain and his feckless crew never responded to it.

11 posted on 12/01/2009 9:51:36 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Love it. Lauer taking on Rove is like a teacup poodle taking on a St. Bernard.


12 posted on 12/01/2009 9:53:54 AM PST by LibWhacker (America awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Wasn’t Lauer one of the brain trusts that cast our efforts in Iraq as impossible, doomed to fail, or having already failed?

I’m sure the faithful women who tune him in will grasp at every word he utters, but I sure don’t have any use for him or the Today show.

I sure wish they’d limit their propaganda to a dedicated cable channel, so I could refuse to tune in.


13 posted on 12/01/2009 9:57:19 AM PST by DoughtyOne (A MELTING POT not a potters wheel. Join us. Don't try to turn this nation into the one you fled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Abdul Rahman Yasin. Came to America on a legitimate Iraqi passport, built the truck bomb to blow up the WTC with KSM's "nephew", and fled to Baghdad -- where he lived for ten years on Saddam's payroll.

But Saddam would never work with al Qaeda, because AQ is Sunni, and Saddam is... uhm... well... Sunni. But secular. Very, very secular. A very secular Sunni -- who built mosques, put "Allah Akhbar" on his flag, required his party officials to attend an islamic university (that he built), broadcast the call to prayer across the country every day and began instituting Sharia law. Of course Saddam would never have anything to do with those AQ radicals. They were like oil and water. That's the ticket.

The scary part is, Americans actually bought this fantasically ridiculous lie. As did many of our isolationist/libertarian/Paulistinian Freepers.

14 posted on 12/01/2009 10:02:00 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

I don’t discuss politics with my 4 yr old son. Why does Rove bother with Lauer?


15 posted on 12/01/2009 10:03:45 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
Matt Lauer: Hard-Hitting Newsman


16 posted on 12/01/2009 10:06:26 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
Saddam is... uhm... well... Sunni. But secular. Very, very secular. A very secular Sunni -- who built mosques, put "Allah Akhbar" on his flag, required his party officials to attend an islamic university (that he built), broadcast the call to prayer across the country every day and began instituting Sharia law.

And famously, supposedly, had the koran written in his own blood. That was one of the stories he spread when he was trying to rebuild his muslim credentials.

17 posted on 12/01/2009 10:11:33 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marron
On display at the Mother of All Battles Mosque he had built.

And that's exactly right... all of these overt acts were done to build credibility among the islamists... and for the specific purpose of recruiting al Qaeda into his war against the west. And Americans are too suicidally stupid to see the obvious.

18 posted on 12/01/2009 10:20:05 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

19 posted on 12/01/2009 10:20:52 AM PST by o2bfree (This president is giving me a headache!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

Journalism Lives

Only on



20 posted on 12/01/2009 10:29:27 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson