deleting and shredding at the speed of light no doubt. wont find a thing. nothing to see. move along.
have a nice day
Where did these “experts” get their atrocious science education? Their university degrees should be revoked for this fraudulent behavior. They have all the integrity of pharma company scientists who lie about their clinical trials, thus endangering the lives of millions of patients when the resulting prescriptions cause damage to health.
Here’s Chris Horner from the other day on Fox News. I like him:
Fox News: Calls for Investigation of Climategate Grow
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qrkpp1Bf5zc&feature=channel
Has anyone noticed the change in wind direction over the last two weeks? I think the ball game is just about over. Just need a few politicians to wake up and look at the thermometer.
James Hansen needs to be stripped of his academic credentials.
Also, here is a link to one of the best, most reasoned sites I have seen: The Climate Skeptic
In particular, see this GREAT lecture the guy has videotaped and put up on his website: Lecture: Catastrophe Denied
Is Global Warming Alarmist James Hansen a Shill for George Soros?
By Jake Gontesky (Bio | Archive)
September 26, 2007 - 08:58 ET
The claims against anthropogenic global warming skeptics are often the same: they’re all shills for big oil or other industry wishing to poke holes in the ‘consensus theory’ of global warming (which isn’t a consensus at all). Under the so-called “politicization of science” program, George Soros’ (the favorite fundraiser of many democrats) has reportedly given as much as $720,000 to Hansen to help package his alarmist claims and get them pushed by the mainstream media (The Soros Threat to Democracy):
How many people, for instance, know that James Hansen, a man billed as a lonely “NASA whistleblower” standing up to the mighty U.S. government, was really funded by Soros’ Open Society Institute , which gave him “legal and media advice”?
That’s right, Hansen was packaged for the media by Soros’ flagship “philanthropy,” by as much as $720,000, most likely under the OSI’s “politicization of science” program.
So he got some big paychecks from Soros - but was there a quid pro quo? The evidence certainly indicates as much:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1902403/posts
Chris Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, has threatened a lawsuit against NASA if by year-end the agency doesn't honor his FOI requests for information on how and why its climate numbers have been consistently adjusted for errors.
And Hansen is the leaker of the emails....they’ve fingered him...
HOORAY Chris Horner and C.E.I.!
Can we all agree to stop calling things something-gate.
What’s going to happen when there is a scandal with some gate somewhere? Gate-gate?
Let’s call it “Hide the weenie.”
“.....like his CRU counterpart Michael Mann, trying to “hide the decline” in temperatures?”
I thought Michael Mann was University of Pennsylvania.
But-—
According to the Dallas Morning News editors, everything is cool with the other three research units.
Here is an excerpt from today’s editorial in the Dallas Morning News.
“”But human-driven climate change does exist. The evidence for it is so strong that the outrageous CRU deception scarcely damages it. CRU is one of four major research units around the world keeping comprehensive global temperature records. Every one of them has reached the same conclusions as the British. Are they all lying?”””
Think about what these editors have said in the above sentence.
1. The British research unit engaged in outrageous deception by using false data and corrupt computer models.
2. The other three research units used good data and good computer models.
3. All four research units reached the same conclusion.
Hmmm???? How can this be? The British engage in outrageous deception and reach conclusion “A”. The other three research units use angelic data and angelic computer models and also reach conclusion “A”.
Since the editors have already confessed that the British are lying, therefore to answer the editors question: “Yes, they are all lying.”
We have Freedom of the Press for a reason. And that reason is not to let the Press engage in propaganda. The Press should be a bastion of truth searchers.
bump
I was waiting for this to show up.
The house of cards is falling...
