Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae

He isn’t paying millions of dollars to keep his long form birth certificate hidden without a reason.

I want to see the long form, not some weird confirmation from the state of Hawaii. That wouldn’t get you in to Little League, let alone a passport or a job.

In any trial, you introduce the actual evidence in a case, when it is available. You don’t have someone testify that they have seen it.

What was the wording used by the legal confirmation? What were the “documents in their possesion”, A Hawaiian birth certificate, a Kenyan birth certificate, a notarized statement, stating that Barack Obama was born at home (which would be a good way to hide a Kenyan Birth)?

He is spending millions of dollars not to show the birth certificate for a reason. If he really was born in Hawaii, what is he hiding? Was he born in a Hawaiian hospital, was his father listed as Barack Obama? If he isn’t even listed as his father, then your Kenyan theory isn’t pertinent. What passport did he use when he traveled abroad — American, Kenyan, Indonesian? Was he adopted by his step father and actually should be considered an Indonesian citizen?


38 posted on 12/05/2009 12:10:04 PM PST by FR_addict (www.conservativesinactionusa.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: FR_addict

“What was the wording used by the legal confirmation? What were the “documents in their possesion”, A Hawaiian birth certificate, a Kenyan birth certificate, a notarized statement, stating that Barack Obama was born at home (which would be a good way to hide a Kenyan Birth)?”

Hawaii DoH replied to Leo Donofrio that he was denied access to documents dating on or about Aug, 1961, which statutorily admits that they do have them. Otherwise they would have replied, the documents do not exist.

Obama is spending millions of dollars to make it look like he IS hiding something. The truth is already Public, he just wants people looking at what they think he is hiding. The information that is going to remove him from office is the fact he was born British, Kenyan, and American and was therefore never a Natural Born Citizen. THAT is what makes him unconstitutional. The Birth Certificate, as long as people think it is some smoking gun, is being used to distract people from looking at what MAKES a person a Natural Born Citizen or not. He does not have parentS who were citizenS when he was born. Thats the issue.


44 posted on 12/05/2009 12:36:56 PM PST by Danae (No political party should pick candidates. That's the voters job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson