Biologic InstituteDesign without a Designer? (Hold onto your hat!!! Evos invite IDers to...)

Biologic Institute ^ | December 9, 2009 | Douglas Axe

[GodGunsGuts]

For the record, this post is being posted in News/Activism by the express permission of Jim Robinson, founder and owner of Free Republic:

“Debate on church doctrine and or threads on specific religious matters may be best posted in the religion forum, but the defense of religious freedom, especially against those who wish to deprive us of same belongs front and center on FR....They banned God and prayer and creationism from public schools and public places, but I’ll be damned if they’re gonna ban Him or it from FR!”

—Jim Robinson

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2203455/posts?page=78#78

[GodGunsGuts]

There will be a lot of weeping and gnashing of teeth in the Dawkins’ wing of the Darwin Party tonight!!!

[dirtymac]

Thank You Jim Robinson

[GodGunsGuts]

Mega Dittos!

[RobbyS]

So far as we know, intelligence comes from intelligence. Modern science is based on the belief that the universe is intelligible. At the same time, there is the inexplicable.

[Agamemnon]

There will be a lot of weeping and gnashing of teeth in the Dawkins’ wing of the Darwin Party tonight!!!

Kind of reminds me of an experiment I composed on a thread a few months ago where I allowed any reader to try to demonstrate whether a computer could or could not self-assemble and it baffled all the "enlightned" evo-knuckledraggers at the time.

That was shortly followed by one of the "clearly-more- baffle-able-than-others" posing as though he had a PhD in something, but didn't know that "peer-reviewed" journals are largely published as magazines.

Evo-knuckledraggers around here are too often revealed to be just imposters and in more ways than just one.

FReegards!

[Natural Law]

Just becase JimRob permits the posting of this in News/Activism doesn't mean he endorses the content:

"I love science. Just like evolution, it’s one of God’s greatest creations. It’s the gift that keeps on giving."

- Jim Robinson

[Natural Law]

You forgot to ping rickydylan; tomzz; medved; tedholden; Natural Law; xcamel; Buck W. Wacka, etc.......

[dirtymac]

my thanks was for posting

[Natural Law]

"You forgot to ping rickydylan; tomzz; medved; tedholden; Natural Law; xcamel; Buck W. Wacka, etc.......

And my apologies to swordmaker and wendy1946 for the oversight...

[RoadGumby]

But nothing to add to this beyond a drive by snarking.

Science IS a beautiful thing. But it can NOT explain all. All will be explained when we get to our home in Heaven.

Jesus loves you Natural, do you know Him as your Savior?

[xcamel]

You can’t post anything without an insult, can you?

[Natural Law]

"Jesus loves you Natural, do you know Him as your Savior?"

I prefer to do my theological discussions in the Religion Forum where they belong. Pick a post there and ping me if you want to explore my faith. While you are at it, please stop ringing my door bell early Saturday mornings asking the same question.

[xcamel]

My peacocks were always good at chasing them off the property....

[Natural Law]

"My peacocks were always good at chasing them off the property...."

Be careful. Using "pea" and "cock" in the same sentence will have them mashing the report abuse button.

[xcamel]

Indian Peafowl, Pavo cristatus, for those in Crevo-Linda.

[Agamemnon]

You can’t post anything without an insult, can you?

Still baffled I see. Must have recognized yourself.

It's just so much fun to watch imposters and pretenders to conservatism like yourself get your panties in a wad when you're busted.

[xcamel]

You claim to be a Christian?

[metmom]

On the occasion of the 150th anniversary of the first publication of Darwin’s theory, this high-caliber panel discussion between evolutionists and Darwin critics will consider the question of whether the evolution of life on Earth is based solely on blind and unguided natural processes, or whether there is non-religiously based, verifiable evidence of meaningful and purposeful acts of creative intelligence in the natural world.

Which puts it smack, dab in the middle of a debate in ........

philosophy

That is not science. Science can deal with the mechanical and explain how, but is useless beyond that.

Yet it is a source of constant amazement the number of scientists who have the arrogance to make pronouncements about subjects outside their expertise using a tool totally inappropriate for the job.

Notice that they qualified the intelligent agent as in the *natural* world? Can't have any of that God creating stuff now, can we?

[metmom]

Don’t forget the part about God creating.....

“I love science. Just like evolution, it’s one of God’s greatest creations. It’s the gift that keeps on giving. God creates everything for a reason. He created you and me. He created GGG, xcamel and all FReepers and placed us all here together on FR for a reason. He even created the duck billed platypus for a reason. Mine is not to question why or even to do or die. To God Be the Glory.” JR