Skip to comments.
VIDEO: Obama AG Eric Holder on CNN 2002-"Detainees not covered by Geneva Convention" (Hypocrisy?)
CNN ^
| 2002
| Eric Holder
Posted on 12/13/2009 12:36:04 PM PST by Titus-Maximus
Eric Holder arguing that Al Queda are not subject to Geneva Convention protections. He has since changed his tune.
(Excerpt) Read more at liveleak.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bho44; democrats; ericholder; frontpage; government; holder; holdertruthfile; islam; obama; terrorism; wot
Interesting video, this man is obviously a political chameleon. Under Clinton he recommended a pardon for international lowlife Marc Rich because Rich's wife was giving huge cash to Clinton; and Holder did not and could not give a rationale for the decision. Now he is selectively prosecuting Al Queda terrorists in a political show trial that will have huge negative security ramifications for this nation, but he doesn't care because it is about political power.
To: Titus-Maximus
He’s an attorney, they argue whatever side their puppet masters want them to. Pull string, watch dance. Repeat.
2
posted on
12/13/2009 12:37:35 PM PST
by
CSA Rebel
To: Titus-Maximus
Communists lie. That is their main trademark.
This whole trial is to keep things shaken up and keep people off balance. As long as things are kept in turmoil they can go ahead and keep subverting our country.
It is in the Communist playbook.
3
posted on
12/13/2009 12:39:37 PM PST
by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: Titus-Maximus
Eric Holder is crook, deceitful, and an extremely dubious man. It is disgusting that he heads up the Department of Justice.
4
posted on
12/13/2009 12:45:42 PM PST
by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: Titus-Maximus
Eric Holder arguing that Al Queda are not subject to Geneva Convention protections Have this politcal hack moron ever read the Geneva Convention Treaties?
5
posted on
12/13/2009 12:46:09 PM PST
by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: darkwing104
The idiot thinks a Geneva Convention when a bunch of women have a meeting all named Genevea.
6
posted on
12/13/2009 12:58:27 PM PST
by
Vaduz
To: CSA Rebel
I truly don’t believe there are words to express the contempt Holder deserves. At least not in this rather limited Aggie vocabulary.
7
posted on
12/13/2009 1:05:47 PM PST
by
Bubba
(FRREEEEEEDOM!)
To: Titus-Maximus
8
posted on
12/13/2009 1:06:17 PM PST
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
To: Titus-Maximus; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...
9
posted on
12/13/2009 1:54:15 PM PST
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Bubba
Trying them before a jury of peers will be interesting. How many Muslims are in New York City?
To: Titus-Maximus
“Detainees not covered by Geneva Convention” (Hypocrisy?)
^
Idiotsy, This whole bunch of Democrats are plain stupid from their lawyers to their economist to Democrat hair brain ideas on health care insurance, et al.
11
posted on
12/13/2009 3:29:24 PM PST
by
Son House
(The Learning Curve for Democrats on Macroeconomics is getting Exponential)
To: Titus-Maximus
where were the Republicans with this during his confirmation hearings?????
12
posted on
12/13/2009 5:02:57 PM PST
by
cdcdawg
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
13
posted on
12/13/2009 7:59:45 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
To: SunkenCiv
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson