Exactly. Her sexual orientation is not normally an issue, only her competence and policies. Making the election about her sexual preference is just wrong.
Maybe that is true, but her statements belie that position, and ANYTIME a "hyphenated" candidate - i.e . african-American, lesbian-American, etc. attains an office they ALWAYS have an alternate agenda of pushing their viewpoint or lifestyle. This usually ends up conflicting with what is best for the people.
Not if her "agenda" is to include issues such as gay marriage, teaching school children that homo-sex is normal and to be accepted, promotion of homosexual lifestyles, and the range of other activist positions.
There is no need to attack her personally, but holding accountability vis a vis her viewpoints and positions re: critically important moral issues should be considered by citizens -- especially for a very important job that has a huge influence on public policy.